Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I'm not Jerome, but I can google this:

Language Matters (blog): The Decoupling of Oil and Gas Prices (Peter McKenzie-Brown on December 27, 2007)

Energy forms are not created equal. Gasoline and diesel are great fuels for transportation, and at the moment there are few viable alternatives. Coal, on the other hand, is just dandy for generating electricity and smelting metals. Natural gas is terrific for space heating, powering electricity-generating turbines and manufacturing fertilizer and petrochemicals.

Because of their different applications and their different energy densities, hydrocarbons have different relative prices. And until recently, they were priced in a band which reflected their relative values. That band is now falling apart. Perhaps this is a sign of things to come - but not before the market experiences what commodity traders call a "short squeeze".

Seeking Alpha: Oil and Natural Gas Will Decouple - Big Time (Greg Pinelli on February 22, 2008)

Oil and Natural Gas are typically welded at the investment hip. They often occur simultaneously in developed fields and are lumped together in much the same way as physical gold and silver - ratios of one to the other are viewed historically and investibility in either looks attractive when those ratios are either high or low.

I'm going to offer an alternative view. Consider oil and natural gas as different bridges, of limited life-spans, to the future. Oil's bridge was built generations ago. It lifted early industrial, fuel powered societies thru an assisted muscle powered age to a decidedly unmuscled technological age. While there are still decades of diminishing supply left it is the fuel of the past. Literally, that bridge has been crossed. Natural gas will, of necessity, carry us over a shorter time span to the next energy bridges, most likely some version of much cleaner coal, nuclear power, and wind/solar power. Even those future generation sources will not be final answers, but in investing, final answers are not necessary. Only profitable ones.

Now maybe the energy experts can comment.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 05:43:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So far I'm seeing that the LNG market has developed a sufficient infrastructure and capacity to transfer gas from one regional market to another. But that still doesn't meant that they are decoupled, as transport and infrastructure costs add a premium, rather that world gas prices are closely aligned.

What links oil and gas (costly infrastructure) is still present and weights in on long term contracts... So i'm pretty confused.

Rien n'est gratuit en ce bas monde. Tout s'expie, le bien comme le mal, se paie tot ou tard. Le bien c'est beaucoup plus cher, forcement. Celine

by UnEstranAvecVueSurMer (holopherne ahem gmail) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 07:21:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't believe oil & gas prices can be decoupled by much in the long run. A BTU is a BTU (a joule is a joule). Both fuels are perfectly substitutable for a large enough number of uses (starting with electricity generation) so that their prices cannot remain too far apart for too long - not as long as boilers can be converted from one to the other.

Short term variations will be uncorrelated, but the overall trend will remain similar.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes

by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 08:47:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... its a sign that people making long term financial investments in gas infrastructure are seeing a serious risk of peak gas.

That's the only way I see it happening.

Obviously the average world prices cannot be entirely decoupled, because it only requires one partial substitute that can be shifted from one region to another to couple the average prices over time. But if only one of two partial substitutes are transportable between global regions, there could be what looks like decoupling within a given region, as the regional BTU_oil/BTU_gas ratio departs from historical patterns.

In the short and medium term, decoupling between oil and gas happens in a given region because the infrastructure to permit physical arbitrage between a lower price and a higher price gas region is not in place. And that is obviously not going to lead to long-term decoupling ... given confidence in the future supply of natural gas, and given a sustained arbitrage opportunity, that infrastructure will eventually get built.

I think more likely people are seeing the effects of the price volatility that comes with the loss of a buffer production capacity ... I think its probably a direct result from queuing theory that if there is not stabilizing buffer in either market, there will not only be a dramatic increase in short term price volatility, but that within the short-term, the price swings in the two markets will not be highly correlated.

Stated (slightly) more simply, as it becomes more common for the spot price in particular regions to swing more widely around the medium term global price trend ...

... the coupling of global oil and gas medium term price trends tells us less and less about the ratio of prices in a particular pair of regional spot markets.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Jun 6th, 2008 at 10:48:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series