Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Okay, you can disagree.  But aside from oscillations about a mean, I am sure that growth cannot be a normal state:  It can be a temporary transient state.

Pure technological growth is a temporary, transient, perennially reproduced state. That's why it proceeds in waves.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Jun 7th, 2008 at 07:00:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Moreover, technological change changes the complexity of the system, so "oscillations around a mean" only make sense between one technological innovation and the next.

When the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino, the job is likely to be ill-done. — John M. Keynes
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Jun 7th, 2008 at 07:04:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... and, extending that (I had to hop onto the bike to go off to teach class), oscillations around a mean presume that there is a structural dynamic creating a central tendency with a fluctuation around that. If what is creating the movement is what is identified above as fluctuations around the mean, then the mean is an epiphenomena of the wave, rather than the wave being oscillations around the mean.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Jun 7th, 2008 at 02:28:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series