The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I was not saying that the neocons are motivated by ideology. And I certainly would not disagree with the suggestion that will-to-power is a very important part of what drives them (although I think this is not simply a matter of personal and group will-to-power, but also relates to a vision of a global order based upon unquestioned American dominance, with Israel and the U.K. as junior partners.)
My quarrel is simply with any view of the neoconservatives as clear-eyed realists. I think ideology really does circumscribe the perceptions both of the American neocons, and of their European (particularly, but not exclusively) British fellow travellers.
Precisely because of this, the very great skill of the neocons in manipulating the United States political system -- and also the British -- generates results which are deeply counter-productive even in terms of their own objectives.
Precisely because the neocons' perceptions were distorted by ideology, they bought the snake oil which Chalabi sold them about the supposedly secular Shia providing the basis for a new U.S.- and Israel- friendly Iraq, which would be a dagger pointed at the heart of the clerical regime in Iran.
In fact, the result was a massive strengthening of that regime -- and this may have been a result which Iranian intelligence anticipated, and sought through Chalabi to achieve. The strategic position both of the United States, and of Israel, has been massively weakened.
And now, the U.S. and Israel find themselves caught between the devil of accepting that if the Iranians do want to construct a nuclear capability, they may very well be unable to do anything about it -- and the deep blue sea of an attack on Iran whose results are incalculable.
At the same time, however strong AIPAC may appear to be, beneath the surface American support for Israel is beginning to come into question -- with the issue of 'dual loyalty' quite patently hovering in the background.
I completely accept that, in putting so many threads together, I made my diary both excessively long, and difficult to follow. This may have been a mistake. But I did so because I thought the different threads illuminated each other -- in part because the issue of ideologically-generated misconception is central to all of them.
The Litvinenko/Scaramella disinformation machine has managed to manipulate the British elite, with as much success as Chalabi manipulated the American -- precisely because people will persist in seeing Russian politics in terms of simplistic ideologically-generated visions, just as they saw Iraqi politics.
by ARGeezer - Aug 20 15 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 16 56 comments
by Oui - Aug 21 3 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 31 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 13 13 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8 125 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6 26 comments
by Oui - Aug 8 16 comments
by Oui - Aug 213 comments
by ARGeezer - Aug 2015 comments
by Oui - Aug 198 comments
by Oui - Aug 1831 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1656 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1313 comments
by Oui - Aug 816 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8125 comments
by Oui - Aug 75 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 626 comments
by Oui - Aug 431 comments
by Oui - Aug 34 comments
by gmoke - Aug 21 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1115 comments
by Oui - Aug 19 comments
by Oui - Jul 3023 comments
by Oui - Jul 2823 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2711 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 255 comments
by john_evans - Jul 2580 comments