The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
You do realize that very few people agree with your framing of the way finance works.
The framing is dependent on the assumptions, and I am well aware that mine are unconventional, but that does not make them "right" or "wrong".
But leaving the framing to one side - which is a matter of "paradigm" - where exactly am I wrong in relation to the mechanics of how the current system works?
You say that Deposits lead to Loans: if that were the case, there could be no new money, since interest-bearing Debt created by Credit Institutions is our money, which is a fact people may not like having pointed out, but a fact nonetheless..
You haven't explained, for example, why Freddie and Fannie needed to be created.
I didn't because I hadn't considered the point, which was remiss of me. From your concluding remark re rates of return, I think you are probably right on the button.
It is also a detail whether banks get their working capital from depositors directly or from inter-bank deals which are just intermediaries to the ultimate depositors.
The entire system is falling down around our ears because of this "detail" of wholesale credit intermediation.
...and I thought the Brits were the masters of understatement!
The multiplicative effect of fractional reserves is a big talking point among the right wing libertarians in the US right now, but their alternatives don't make much sense - we are not going back to a gold standard.
It always has been, and that view goes way back to silver dollars, the "Cross of Gold" and all the rest, over a hundred years ago.
It represents a profound misunderstanding of how the system works, as I think you and I agree.
I'm proposing what would be de facto monetisation of land rental values and energy value through the pervasive and networked spread and use of "Peer to Peer" investment within frameworks other than "the Corporation".
ie a variation on a "Debt/Equity" swap.
These would operate within a "Clearing Union" approach to monetary exchange and credit - very close to that proposed by Keynes at Bretton Woods.
Such an approach may not be conventional, but "asset based" variations on conventional equity eg REIT's, ETF's, Income and Royalty Trusts, Hedge Funds constituted as LP's, Sukuks, are becoming pretty mainstream these days.
If you don't think such an "asset-based" approach could work, I'd be interested in your reasoning...
"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed"
by gmoke - Nov 28
by gmoke - Nov 12 7 comments
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 18 comments
by Oui - Dec 1
by gmoke - Nov 302 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Nov 2837 comments
by Oui - Nov 278 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments
by Oui - Nov 1224 comments
by gmoke - Nov 127 comments
by Oui - Nov 1114 comments
by Oui - Nov 10