The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Emmett Dunphy accuses me of being "anti-American", and making ludicrous and laughable claims about the links between the McCain Presidential Campaign and the South Ossetia invasion - whilst not being able to rebut any of the facts contained in my letter (published 16/8/08). For the record, let me note that: 1. My letter drew attention to the close personal and financial links between the McCain presidential campaign and President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili - and said nothing, good, bad or indifferent about the US as whole. 2. My letter said nothing about Putin's intentions or whether the Russian intervention can be construed as reasonable or over-reaction 3. Given that almost all commentators, from all sides, seem to agree that a Russian response to the Georgian attack on South Ossettia was forseeable, if not inevitable, it seems reasonable to ask why Mikheil Saakashvili would engage in such an adventure. 4. Mr. Dunphy then claims that I am a beneficiary of the invasion of South Ossetia in that it enables me to spin my "anti-American" agenda and that "concern or solidarity for the ordinary civilians caught up in the conflict are conspicuous only by their absence" in my letter and that I should "cease masquerading" as anti-war. 5. I would have thought that concern for the innocent civilians caught up in this conflict was obviously the primary concern expressed in my letter together with a fear that their misfortune might have been occasioned, at least in part, by the dynamics of the US Presidential campaign. That is the nub of my letter which Emmett Dunphy dismisses as "ludicrous" and "laughable if they weren't so serious". At least he does acknowledge that it is a serious charge, yet he does not challenge any of the facts which I listed in support of my argument. Blanket accusations of anti-Americanism masquerading as anti-war activism are of course the stock in trade of militarists and apologists for the neo-con project of the "New American Century" everywhere. However I feel it is important that the causes of this conflict - and particularly any attempts to gain political/economic/personal advantage from a re-kindling of Cold War tensions needs to be highlighted and exposed before they are lost in the propaganda battles that characterise any war. As a famous American once said: "The first casualty of war is truth." Senator Hiram Warren Johnson. I urge Emmett Dunphy not to participate in the slaughter.
1. My letter drew attention to the close personal and financial links between the McCain presidential campaign and President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili - and said nothing, good, bad or indifferent about the US as whole.
2. My letter said nothing about Putin's intentions or whether the Russian intervention can be construed as reasonable or over-reaction
3. Given that almost all commentators, from all sides, seem to agree that a Russian response to the Georgian attack on South Ossettia was forseeable, if not inevitable, it seems reasonable to ask why Mikheil Saakashvili would engage in such an adventure.
4. Mr. Dunphy then claims that I am a beneficiary of the invasion of South Ossetia in that it enables me to spin my "anti-American" agenda and that "concern or solidarity for the ordinary civilians caught up in the conflict are conspicuous only by their absence" in my letter and that I should "cease masquerading" as anti-war.
5. I would have thought that concern for the innocent civilians caught up in this conflict was obviously the primary concern expressed in my letter together with a fear that their misfortune might have been occasioned, at least in part, by the dynamics of the US Presidential campaign.
That is the nub of my letter which Emmett Dunphy dismisses as "ludicrous" and "laughable if they weren't so serious". At least he does acknowledge that it is a serious charge, yet he does not challenge any of the facts which I listed in support of my argument.
Blanket accusations of anti-Americanism masquerading as anti-war activism are of course the stock in trade of militarists and apologists for the neo-con project of the "New American Century" everywhere. However I feel it is important that the causes of this conflict - and particularly any attempts to gain political/economic/personal advantage from a re-kindling of Cold War tensions needs to be highlighted and exposed before they are lost in the propaganda battles that characterise any war.
As a famous American once said: "The first casualty of war is truth." Senator Hiram Warren Johnson.
I urge Emmett Dunphy not to participate in the slaughter.
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 11 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 6 4 comments
by gmoke - Mar 7
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 5 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Oui - Mar 261 comment
by Oui - Mar 259 comments
by Oui - Mar 244 comments
by Oui - Mar 246 comments
by Oui - Mar 23
by Oui - Mar 231 comment
by Oui - Mar 211 comment
by Oui - Mar 191 comment
by Oui - Mar 19
by Oui - Mar 18
by Oui - Mar 175 comments
by Oui - Mar 16
by Oui - Mar 165 comments
by Oui - Mar 1510 comments
by Oui - Mar 155 comments
by Oui - Mar 147 comments
by Oui - Mar 1312 comments
by Oui - Mar 12
by Oui - Mar 1113 comments