Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
How would the US react if Russia put military bases on Cuba, Mexico, most Latin and central American countries, Canada and Greenland?  Pretty robustly I would expect - as the US has consistently overthrown or undermined even mildly nationalistic or social democratic latin American regimes.

So why would you expect Russia to react differently to its former allies, current neighbours, and now hosts to US military /missile bases?

Obviously I would hope both the US and Russia would respect the sovereignty of those nations.  But Russia doesn't have its troops in over 100 Sovereign states - so if you are to criticise it for relatively marginal incursions into Georgiam, you must also criticise the Bush doctrine that the US can attack almost anywhere it pleases, when it pleases, if that county is deemed to be hostile to US interests.

Vote McCain for war without gain

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Tue Aug 19th, 2008 at 05:54:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think one can as well put up the question, what are we discussing, likely realistic answers or how far Russia's action could go morally justified, stretching this term as far as possible.

Even if you disagree with Marek's description under the moral aspect, it describes likely reality.

Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den Menschen
Volker Pispers

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Tue Aug 19th, 2008 at 06:01:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I'm not in the business of justify any countries actions, I'm just trying to understand them, and one framework for doing so is to work on the real political assumption that each state acts in its own self-interest.

I don't believe Georgia acted in its own self interest in attack South Ossetia (and Russian peace keepers there) and so I have to look for another explanation - e.g. Saakashvili is a fool or he was misled by his American advisers.

I can understand why Russia seized on this opportunity to reassert its influence in the region and it might even put further pressure on Georgia to get rid of Saakashvili and the US base there.

I can also understand that this wll make all Russia's other neighbours extremely nervous.  They have to decide whether they want to develop good neighbourly relations with Russia or risk further antagonising Russia by joining Nato.

Realistically, is Poland/Nato/US going to go to war with Russia if it invades Ukraine, Bylorussia, Georgia, Crimea?  If the answer is no, then it is in those countries interest to develop friendly relation with Russia.

Is it in the EU's interest to to foment a return to the Cold War?  If not, then it is in the EU's interest to promote friendly relations with Russia and distance itself from a Neo-con led US.

(Politics 101 for small nations.  If your neighbouring state is much more powerful militarily than you are, it is best to develop economic and political relationships which reduce the risk of militarism becoming the dominant MO between your countries.)

Vote McCain for war without gain

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Tue Aug 19th, 2008 at 06:16:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Realistically, is Poland/Nato/US going to go to war with Russia if it invades Ukraine, Bylorussia, Georgia, Crimea?  If the answer is no, then it is in those countries interest to develop friendly relation with Russia.

There seem quite some influential people in the US, who would be willing to order the defense of Georgia and Ukraine, if they could get them into NATO. As I interprete Marek's comments, Poland would act as well, because they would see an agression of Russia against Georgia or Ukraine as a possible prelude to an attack of Poland.

As for your last paragraph, with US backing, eastern Europeans are not THAT small, that they would have to go along with everything Russia does.

Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den Menschen
Volker Pispers

by Martin (weiser.mensch(at)googlemail.com) on Tue Aug 19th, 2008 at 06:34:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It is in no country's interest to have a major war - that's true of Russia over a Ukraine in NATO and the US or Poland over a Russian dominated Ukraine. Would Russia do so nonetheless? I don't know. Would the Poles and the US, I very much doubt they would do so directly, but they would certainly adopt a radically harsher policy towards Russia which could easily lead to a spiral of escalation.

As for EU interests. Ummh, last I checked Poland and the Baltics were part of the EU, something you seem to be forgetting. If you mean the Western EU countries - that depends. To the extent that they adopt the kind of policy you and others here are suggesting, they can forget about any sort of EU-Russia cooperation that requires unanimity, they can also forget about any sort of treaties strengthening the EU. They also have to depend on the US deciding it will not agree to take up Poland and the Baltics on their request for closer military cooperation and US bases, and a more hostile policy towards Russia. Or to put it differently, if the US is as recklessly imperialist as you think it is, then your policy has a very good chance of leading to a European war. Also keep in mind that Russian can't supply the rest of Europe with energy if it doesn't supply Poland, unless the Europeans agree to compensate Poland for that situation with energy supplies at a similar price - all those pipelines, existing or proposed, run through or right next to Poland.

As for your politics 101 - the more accurate version would be, if you're in a region claimed by one power as its sphere of interest, and without another great power able and willing to back you up enough so you can make it too painful to ever attack, then you're better advised to do as you say. Think Cuba, Nicaragua, Chile, Lebanon, Syria, Vietnam, Korea, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, etc. Georgia made the wrong calculation.

The Ukrainian population isn't interested in joining NATO - if it were, then the risks for Russia would be far higher. Ukraine is a far bigger and more powerful country in it's own right, and it is much easier to help geographically. Russia would face a problem that makes the American task in Iraq look like a, ummh cakewalk (pardon the expression). But again, the Ukrainians aren't into the idea of paying a major price to be firmly in the US camp, so the issue is moot.

The Belarussians are being tolerated by the Poles, Balts, and Americans.

by MarekNYC on Tue Aug 19th, 2008 at 11:15:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
MarekNYC:
It is in no country's interest to have a major war - that's true of Russia over a Ukraine in NATO and the US or Poland over a Russian dominated Ukraine.

No, but certainly some people would profit from increased tensions - just as they've profited from Iraq, while the rest of the US has bled itself white, and just as they profited from WWII.

It goes without saying that there are people in the US who stand to profit hugely from Cold War II.

So far, this isn't so true of Russia. There's a lot of face saving and penis waving happening at the moment, but naked profit doesn't seem to be quite such a motivation.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Wed Aug 20th, 2008 at 07:42:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Cuba - Russia defended it, but agreed not to station nukes. Nicaragua - contras. Chile - Pinochet (Chile used East Bloc military advisors). Small and wanting to be independent of the US but carefully avoiding any security relationship with the East Bloc, oops, sorry Guatemala. Big, doing the same - Mexico did fine under the PRI.
by MarekNYC on Tue Aug 19th, 2008 at 11:19:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series