The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
A rapid increase in savings rate could lead to more trouble in the short term in the US.
A rapid increase in savings rate would indicate an increase in some combination of investment, net exports, or net private wealth creation through government deficit spending.
... but how could it cause problems? ... the increase in aggregate saving cannot occur unless the increase in incomes from which to save occurs first. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
I mean you are right, that an increase in the savings rate has something to do with net exports and investement, as the saving has to be put somewhere. But savings is the trigger, the thing which people decide to do. Investment isn't too strongly dependent on local savings rates. If you want to borrow money for an investment and nobody in your country saves, you may import the money from another country where people do save.
And given that, there is no reason, why the output should not go down, when people start to save more money. There will be less demand for foreign financing of US investment, but when they buy less domestic products, the producers will produce less. If in the US something similar happens as in Germany from 2003 - 2005 I would call it trouble in the short term.
Of course in the long term that is the right thing to do, still.
To the second, this is clearly wrong. You can increase your savings rate without higher income, when you stop buying stuff you formely bought regularly. This is what must happen in the US. People there (aggregated, just to mention, that nobody complains he didn't) have lived quite a lot beyong their means. The time of recognizing this is close, either somewhat voluntarily now, or forced in a few years. Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
The fiction of the independent power of "savings" is very useful for justifying policies in favor of the wealthy, but not very useful for actually following what is going on with an economy. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
I don't see really the point you want to make. Der Amerikaner ist die Orchidee unter den MenschenVolker Pispers
The next round effect of the decision is the loss of spending, both in terms of a reduction in exogenously financed consumer spending and a reduction in the propensity to consume out of income. So the consequential dimension of the decision is the decision to cut back on spending. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 19 18 comments
by Oui - Sep 13 35 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 5 comments
by Cat - Sep 13 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 27
by Oui - Sep 268 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 242 comments
by Oui - Sep 1918 comments
by gmoke - Sep 173 comments
by Oui - Sep 153 comments
by Oui - Sep 15
by Oui - Sep 1411 comments
by Oui - Sep 1335 comments
by Cat - Sep 139 comments
by Oui - Sep 126 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 115 comments
by Oui - Sep 929 comments
by Oui - Sep 713 comments
by Oui - Sep 61 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 22 comments
by gmoke - Sep 2
by Oui - Sep 1181 comments
by Oui - Aug 315 comments
by gmoke - Aug 302 comments