The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Gang 8
includes some first class brains, including Professor Michael Hudson, often quoted here; an ex IMF economist, Gunnar Tomasson; Dr Richard Werner, an economist with particular understanding of Japan; and IMHO the guy who knows more about banking than anyone - the formidable Geoffrey Gardiner.
This exchange is salutary.
Arno: One could also ask a question regarding inflationary effects of (government) printing that much fresh money..
Geoffrey: No, this comment is silly. The credit creation (new) is to compensate for the money being destroyed by bad debts. The manoeuvre is not pro-inflationary but anti-deflationary.
My highlights, and indeed what I have been saying for some time.
...shades of Captain Mainwaring and Corporal Pike of
Dad's Army
in the exchange....
I agree with much of Gang 8's "Creditary Economics" analysis, but I question their assumption that Money actually is Credit.
In my view, while it is possible to monetise credit - and indeed the monetisation of interest bearing debt is at the heart of our problems - credit is, rather, only a necessary part of a monetary system.
In particular, Gang 8 assumes that "Equity" - in the form of shares in a Joint Stock limited Liability Corporation - may also be defined as "Credit" because in accounting terms it is on the same (Credit) side of the balance sheet.
My view of this assumption is that Equity and Debt are qualitatively different, since Equity is not time limited - ie does not incorporate an obligation to repay - and Debt/Credit is. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
This is based on the bizarre steam-economy view that money is a quasi-physical substance which can be created and destroyed, and that conservation laws apply.
Money is tangible (well - quasi-tangible) confidence and faith. Printing more money actually destroys confidence. So does giving credit to people who can't repay loans - by definition.
Although there's a lot of accounting to sort through, nothing much is going to improve until toxic relationships are flushed through the system and replaced with trustworthy relationships which are plausible and convincing.
A financial culture baseed on ripping off everyone in sight with no thought of future consequences is even more corrosive than inflation is.
by gmoke - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 30 25 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 16 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 50 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Oui - Jul 5
by Oui - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3
by Oui - Jul 31 comment
by gmoke - Jul 2
by Oui - Jun 3025 comments
by Oui - Jun 301 comment
by Oui - Jun 296 comments
by Oui - Jun 2735 comments
by Oui - Jun 2550 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2416 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 2313 comments
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1616 comments