The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
What often happens with Imperial Overstretch is that lots of essential stuff are sacrificed in the medium term to preserve the Empire, but in the longer term it is for naught, because that sacrifice includes the economic basis for actually being able to maintain the base empire.
If the US$ collapses, there goes the overseas base network. It may require throwing a lot of essential government spending overboard first, and could take a decade with cycles of dollar dives before it becomes completely untenable, but its a system that is a drain on the external accounts, and a country cannot simply will the rest of the world into wanting to acquire financial assets denominated in its currency. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
....but funding allowing continued weaponry etc development is no longer available.... "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Those creditors are less than likely to make that argument. That's why there is a serious risk of the US pursuing the maintenance of the Base Network Empire well after it becomes clear to all and sundry that it is not sustainable over the longer term. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
Maybe led by China, of course, but they would never dream of acting alone. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
Once the bulge created by the pro-population-explosion policies of Mao begins to pass out of child bearing age, the need to grow employment at this massive pace will begin to ebb with it. And unless the US gets its economic house in order, there's a good chance that that will be the end of the Chinese propping up the US$.
Now, under much of the conventional wisdom, the economic threat to the US of the Base Network Empire does not appear to be a short-term problem, though it clearly undermines the strength of the US Economy long term.
Now, certainly, if the US$ appears to be not worth holding in the short term, then obviously the Chinese will abandon it. But if the US government has bungled economic management that badly, it would also be a poor risk in terms of making a "we'll keep financing you if you deliberately adopt a peace-time economy" deal. The pragmatic focus would be on Europe and Japan among high income nations, probably also including Australasia for its resources. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
But China would have a big incentive to invest in a US "Green New Deal" or maybe a redeployment from a War on Terror to a War on Climate Change:
(a) substitution - because every barrel the US saves and does not consume is one more available to China;
(b) technology transfer - any breakthrough technologies or advances would be simpler and cheaper for them to get at if they invested heavily in them, or even owned them. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
A polity rebelling against the fact that it cannot afford the external account spending that it wishes to engage in gets to see its exchange rates plunge as long as it keeps up the fight.
And a country that has its exchange rates plunge rapidly enough is heading for hyperinflation, if it is structurally dependent on imports, as the US has become over the last three decades.
When people are faced with the hard choice between handing over hard currency (by hypothesis, not US$) to get oil, or to fund an overseas base network, I'm expecting the Military Industrial Complex to go up against the Highway Suburban Complex and come out second. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
Without a vibrant economy that can generate money and goods we cannot long maintain effective military power. Played intelligently, we can maintain enough power to matter. Played stupidly we could become irrelevant. That should be the outline of the national security discussion. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
South China Morning Post China banks told to halt lending to US banks by Alan Wheatley and Langi Chiang Sep 24, 2008 9:52pm EDT BEIJING, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Chinese regulators have told domestic banks to stop interbank lending to U.S. financial institutions to prevent possible losses during the financial crisis, the South China Morning Post reported on Thursday. The Hong Kong newspaper cited unidentified industry sources as saying the instruction from the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) applied to interbank lending of all currencies to U.S. banks but not to banks from other countries. "The decree appears to be Beijing's first attempt to erect defences against the deepening U.S. financial meltdown after the mainland's major lenders reported billions of U.S. dollars in exposure to the credit crisis," the SCMP said. A spokesman for the CBRC had no immediate comment.
BEIJING, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Chinese regulators have told domestic banks to stop interbank lending to U.S. financial institutions to prevent possible losses during the financial crisis, the South China Morning Post reported on Thursday.
The Hong Kong newspaper cited unidentified industry sources as saying the instruction from the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) applied to interbank lending of all currencies to U.S. banks but not to banks from other countries.
"The decree appears to be Beijing's first attempt to erect defences against the deepening U.S. financial meltdown after the mainland's major lenders reported billions of U.S. dollars in exposure to the credit crisis," the SCMP said.
A spokesman for the CBRC had no immediate comment.
The only resolution to this political quandry is of course to seize all assets of Chineses nationals and banks held by US bank branches. That'll show 'em, the terrists. Diversity is the key to economic and political evolution.
by gmoke - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 30 25 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 16 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 50 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Oui - Jul 5
by Oui - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3
by Oui - Jul 31 comment
by gmoke - Jul 2
by Oui - Jun 3025 comments
by Oui - Jun 301 comment
by Oui - Jun 296 comments
by Oui - Jun 2735 comments
by Oui - Jun 2550 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2416 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 2313 comments
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1616 comments