The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
A home owner must maintain insurance and pay property taxes. Depending on how marginal the participants in this scam were - it is possible a percentage of the homes will be foreclosed no matter what. What that percentage is is unknown to me.
You can't save everyone, but you could - possibly - save the economy as a whole.
It would be the difference between controlled demolition and an uncontrolled implosion.
Part of the problem is - literally - the lack of control, which means that no one knows what the limits of the disaster are. The bailout plan is a finger-in-the-dyke attempt to plug some of the holes, and it's not bad as far as it goes - which possibly won't be very far.
It's the system of uncontrolled detached speculation which is the problem. The current proto-meltdown is an effect, not a primary cause.
Replacing explicit control would start to restore confidence by setting some firm boundaries.
So if there's going to be a political change, now is the time for it.
What we're achieving here in our discussions is a foundation which can be used by those necessary visionaries, that undergirds the courage needed to tell the truth and propose a way out. This situation demands the equivalent to real entrepreneurship. Many can write about or support innovation, but true entrepreneurship is very rare. It demands the ability to stand up and say no, willing to walk away from a deal that does not really reflect what you seek... despite the deal being partly worthwhile.
So it is now. The system is so broken, only those with the courage to actually say it can move us forward. I too, like Grandpa, believe the global economic fundamentals are sound, only just not on this planet.
A National Investment Bank (internationally supported) has to be but a main gear in the drive train building a sustainable infrastructure. Simple, except the dinosaur interests like the coal lobby are flailing with all their power to survive by crushing us. An international Apollo program of sustainability, which begins with building insulation and the immediate re-channeling of industrial infrastructure towards wind and solar on a massive scale, is indeed our best hope.
But then there's GE's Wall STreet darling, Jeffrey Immelt yesterday, calling on Congress to ratify the nuclear deal with India, and calling nuclear power " the safest, non-polluting energy generation technology." I don't hear him pontificating about GE's wind turbines (decent but not particularly the heights of the industry), as they only make up some 3% of GE's gross.
But then i've been saying pretty much the same damn thing for decades now. Sustainability is only tens of millions of purposeful jobs globally in an aggressive program to fix this civilization. And windsmiths love their work, because it's satisfying working hard towards a dream. "Hey man, i did 3 turbines yesterday, and climbed 5 times!"
/rant "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
another thing, i have to report i'm certifiably insane. Despite three decades of high-level fighting against the combustion of fossil fuels, i'm going to spend part of this gorgeous weekend in Germany watching the glitz and glamour circus of the fastest Benzin-burning vehicles in the world, now running under the world's biggest and brightest lighting system, as the Ecclestone ecstasy moves to that bastion of future capitalism, Singapore. (OK, i dream of sponsoring Formula 1 cars running on renewably-generated hydrogen.) "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
I'm thinking of doing one on the single malts of Islay.... Vote McCain for war without gain
Treating the disease is impossible without different basic political assumptions.
Yup.
aspiring to genteel poverty
For the Occupier, the "affordability" of reasonable index-linked house rentals means it's more likely that they can pay.
ie affordability = certainty.
For the Small Guy Investor, such property-based Units of index-linked rentals would provide a nice solid home for at least part of his pension portfolio.....
For the Occupier, it is a new "Rent to Buy" option where he can gradually acquire Units of rental values of land held by a "Custodian" (exactly as blue chip stocks are technically held by Custodians like State Street now) until the nominal income on his Units offsets the nominal rental due in respect of his occupation.
ie he is "Paying it Forward".
And if times are hard, then Occupiers can pay rentals in saved Units, not $.... "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 13 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 42 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 15 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Bernard - Jun 6 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 6 4 comments
by Oui - Jun 8 107 comments
by Oui - Jun 30
by Oui - Jun 296 comments
by Oui - Jun 2723 comments
by Oui - Jun 2542 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2413 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 23
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1615 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1514 comments
by Oui - Jun 1311 comments
by Oui - Jun 1240 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1015 comments
by Oui - Jun 95 comments
by Oui - Jun 8107 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 64 comments