The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Or not. Only online for 1999 and 2004 apparently. See here.
On the other hand, we've also been observing domestic electoral trends in the old Member States. Aside of increasing fragmentation and an increasingly drifting electorate, the overall trend has been to the right.
...
Which is another thing that needs to be communicated. The Council is heavy on the right. Migeru once coloured in a map of that (which, however, didn't account for coalition governments). But it should be made clear how many Council votes are effectively on the EPP's side. A few hours work of looking around on wikipedia and entering the stuff in an spreadsheet, I'd guess. If it can't be found online.
So what does this mean? In general that it was not represented parties that increased, but new parties that entered made the swing in seats. For clarification, the new member states were represented in the EP in april-may 2004, and I assume they were represented by the parties present in their national parliaments.
A detailed analysis of the parties that entered in 2004 and needed a new group would perhaps yield interesting results, but that is beyond the scope of my investigation. I would assume there was new entries in both old and new member states, but more from the new ones, but that is just a guess.
Safe to say, this at least supports the later part of nannes working thesis:
nanne:
My working thesis is that low saliency elections can amplify the drifting of the electorate and are ideal for breakthroughs of new parties.
A swedish kind of death:
I crunched some numbers after the last european parliament elections, frustrated by not finding the relative increases and decreases totally anywhere. Just a lot of reporting on local changes. Thought you could use it if planning a series. Anyway, dug it up and here it is: Before 2004 elections (seats): EPP 294 PES 232 ELDR 67 EUL 55 GREEN 47 UEN 30 EDD 17 No-group 44 Total 786 After 2004 elections (seats) EPP 276 PES 200 ELDR 67 EUL 39 GREEN 42 UEN 27 EDD 15 No-group 60 Total 732 And percentage of the seats: old * new EPP 37,4 -> 37,7 PES 29,5 -> 27,3 ELDR 8,5 -> 9,2 EUL 7,0 -> 5,3 GREEN 6,0 -> 5,7 UEN 3,8 -> 3,7 EDD 2,2 -> 2,0 No-group 5,6 -> 9,0 The numbers on the new parliament is from june 2004, I believe it has changed some since. I think the ELDR swallowed a lot of the new in the no-group group when they changed name in the autumn of 2004. Anyway what was most striking to me at the time was (except the lack of reporting on the election results instead of reporting on which local representatives will go to Brussels) how little changed. Lots of local changes but in total very constant.
Before 2004 elections (seats): EPP 294 PES 232 ELDR 67 EUL 55 GREEN 47 UEN 30 EDD 17 No-group 44 Total 786
After 2004 elections (seats) EPP 276 PES 200 ELDR 67 EUL 39 GREEN 42 UEN 27 EDD 15 No-group 60 Total 732
And percentage of the seats: old * new EPP 37,4 -> 37,7 PES 29,5 -> 27,3 ELDR 8,5 -> 9,2 EUL 7,0 -> 5,3 GREEN 6,0 -> 5,7 UEN 3,8 -> 3,7 EDD 2,2 -> 2,0 No-group 5,6 -> 9,0
The numbers on the new parliament is from june 2004, I believe it has changed some since. I think the ELDR swallowed a lot of the new in the no-group group when they changed name in the autumn of 2004.
Anyway what was most striking to me at the time was (except the lack of reporting on the election results instead of reporting on which local representatives will go to Brussels) how little changed. Lots of local changes but in total very constant.
Swedish wikipedia was kind enough to indicate how much bigger ALDE became when it united ELDR and EDD.
Alliansen liberaler och demokrater för Europa - Wikipedia
88 (EP-valet 2004) 101 (nuvarande)
("Nuvarande" means present, so an increase from 88 to 101.)
Mucking about at wikipedia I also came across this chapter:
European Parliament election, 2004 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
European Parliament Election 2004: Estimated Notional Results, January 2007
That is the estimate gains or losses during the post-election period. It would appear that the post-election swings for most party groups are larger then the election swings.
And aditional note from swedish wikipedia:
This would indicate that the real election result in 2004 - real in terms of political effect - was a failure of the pre-2004 rightwing (ALDE+EPP) coalition to hold their mayority and thus a return to a previous grand coalition. If that and the nominal position of the partygroups (PES to the left of ALDE) is to be trusted, then the political result of the 2004 election was a drift to the left. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by gmoke - Aug 25
by gmoke - Aug 19
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 12
by Oui - Sep 114 comments
by Oui - Sep 111 comment
by Oui - Sep 102 comments
by Oui - Sep 9
by Oui - Sep 87 comments
by Oui - Sep 8
by Oui - Sep 6
by Oui - Sep 4
by Oui - Sep 1
by Oui - Aug 31
by Oui - Aug 254 comments
by Oui - Aug 23
by Oui - Aug 21
by Oui - Aug 20
by Oui - Aug 18