Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
They started off taking about 3 entrants per country 27*3 = 51 but we ended up with 85 entrants, so they seem to have allowed more people in from the bigger countries in response to a lot of demand. What struck me was that many entrants had not blogged before - and few had written much on politics - and so the exercise seemed to be more about engaging the next generation of journalists with the EU, rather than selecting the best bloggers out there.  Nanne would be more up to speed on how it was organised...

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 08:34:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The next generation of bloggers is the next generation of journalists. Ten years from now print and video media aren't going to look anything like they do today.

Would it have been so hard for countries to shortlist their top blogs themselves, with perhaps a special section for pan-Euro blogs like ET - and then to base the competition on that?

Really, it probably wouldn't, which makes this conference look suspiciously like a rather pointless PR exercise for the media mainstream, and not so much an attempt to expand blog power for more open ends.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 09:12:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That was my point - it doesn't seem to be about selecting/promoting the best bloggers currently out there, but about recruiting the next generation of journalists to the EU cause - using blogging technology as the hook.  

Having said that, you can't criticise the EU for lousy PR and then also criticise them when they do launch an initiative like this in an attempt to boost voter turnout. However I could see some very good bloggers out there being disappointed that they have been excluded from an opportunity to reach a wider audience.

My sense is that this is more about tapping into the online social networking scene and engaging it with the EU rather than producing a quality of output to rival the MSM.

notes from no w here

by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 09:23:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Frank Schnittger:
Having said that, you can't criticise the EU for lousy PR and then also criticise them when they do launch an initiative like this in an attempt to boost voter turnout.

Yes you can, because if the goal was to boost voter turnout, the initiative has been a total PR failure.

You don't boost turnout by farming journalists - you boost it by giving the journalists something exciting and involving to report.

So many EU initiatives, from Lisbon down, seem frankly Weimar-ish - well meaning and not entirely a bad thing in theory, but politically naive and disconnected from the interests of their constituencies.

Where are the pro-EU op-eds? The counter-attacks in the Anglo press which report on and support EP legislation? Where are the EU critiques of the Anglo consensus?

These are all happening in blog space, where they're reaching a small but interested audience, but they're almost non-existent in mainstream journalism.

So a conference to promote more of the same when the pro-EU action is happening elsewhere can hardly be considered a success, surely.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 05:47:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, a lot of journalism students in there.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 01:04:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series