Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Seems very young to have had a lot of responsibility

Yeah, a yuppie.

Daniel Antal

I am a Hungarian economist with a strong interest in institutional reform in new Europe and an occasional essayist in Hungarian daily and weekly papers. My carreer was connected to regulated industries (telecom, banking, energy, railways). I was the Hungarian rail regulator between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2008. The Hungarian Rail Office was abolished by a governmental decree in June 2008.

<very unbalanced personal opinion>
I first took notice of him for the extreme neoliberalism of his 'occassional essays' prior to his railway forays. Then, not long after I got my job with the railway, he set sights just on our offices. It took some time until he got his Hungarian Rail Office formed, during which time we were in limbo, but then we had to move. (But, funny thing, I never got to encounter him personally during his frequent visits, only saw his English-made car.)

The Hungarian Rail Office was to be an independent regulator in an open-access, free-market re-shaping of the railway sector. However, everyone whose competences Antal wanted to be transmitted to the ÍOffice, and everyone with power to lose in the top echelons of the continually re-organised Hungarian State Railways, resisted every way they could.

A competition where I must state I had no sympathy for either side: as readersd of this blog know, I think open-access on railways is a really bad idea, but also see the current crop of non-railwaymen managers picked to alibi-reform/rationalise a company hamstrung by decades of lack of investment as a bunch of incompetents.
</vupo>

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 01:36:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I suppose - by definition - a newly created Indepe3ndent Regulator office is going to have a lot of turf wars with those who exercised those powers before.  Also, presumably, he got the job because he was ideological well disposed to the concept of independent regulation/open access.  Open access to previously semi-monopoly utilities in the name of efficiency/competition almost always seems to involve increased prices (to attract operators), reduced investment (to increase short term profits), and ultimately an even more dysfunctional system.

notes from no w here
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot male dotty communists) on Thu Jan 29th, 2009 at 04:40:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series