Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Will Year of Miracles Be Squandered?: Cynicism Threatens to Destroy Gains of 1989 - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International

Poland and Central Europe have prospered since the fall of communism in 1989. Today, however, Europe is faced with a great test. A leading Polish journalist and ex-dissident argues that cynisism and the lure of authoritarianism are the new threats to a European freedom secured only two decades ago.

What are the reasons behind what happened 20 years ago? The most banal answer to this question is that communism proved economically ineffective. But there are still communist countries today, despite their systems' inefficiencies: Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam, and China. Therefore, we cannot be satisfied with a purely economic answer to this question.

The year 1989 was a year of miracles, an annus mirabilis. Yet the explanations for the fall of communism differ...

...Communism fell, paradoxically, because the Soviet elite believed it could be reformed...

Part 2: The Working Class Who Toppled Communism Were the First Victims of the Transformation

Adam Michnik was a leading dissident in communist Poland and is editor in chief of the Warsaw-based daily Gazeta Wyborcza.

(As a general comment: though I think he has the usual CEE liberal ideological blinders on, in-between there are lots of astute observations in the piece --- some in separate comments below.)


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Fri Oct 23rd, 2009 at 02:11:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
 

Four Perspectives

When I look back, I have four perspectives: a Polish one, because I am a Pole; a Russian one, because the cards were really shuffled there; a Central European one, because the fall of communism was not a purely Polish phenomenon; and finally, the perspective of the West.

The West was not at all prepared for what happened... The decisive factor was Russia. The perestroika reforms set new forces free, and they triggered further processes that developed a new dynamic. For a long time, neither the ruling communist elite nor the opposition in Central Europe understood what was actually underway in Russia.

...In Poland, the idea behind the Round Table was to bring about a kind of Finlandization of Poland. We knew we could not win a war against Russia, which is why we had to work with what came to us from Russia. Thus perestroika was our natural ally.




*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Oct 23rd, 2009 at 02:12:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The change in the party began in Hungary. Imre Pozsgay, the leader of the liberal nationalist wing, was one of those responsible for the "thaw" in the public media. He also encouraged an accommodation with the "nationalist" wing of the opposition... The Hungarian opposition was weaker than the Polish, and from the beginning it was divided into two currents, nationalist and liberal...

Poland went furthest, as the government's Round Table negotiations with Solidarity broke through the iron logic of the communist regime and opened it up to ideas that had not been heard since August 1980, when it was at its height... it was a major revolution without a revolution. No one took to the streets; there were no barricades, and no executions... it is unclear how things would have developed if both sides in Poland had realized that their decisions would lead to German unification.

...East Germany was a barrack-state that would not exist without the Red Army. The East German opposition thought differently. It had the most left-leaning opposition of all the East bloc countries. It sought the democratization of East Germany. The autumn demonstrations in East Germany began with the slogan "We are the people" before the slogan "We are one people" emerged.




*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Fri Oct 23rd, 2009 at 02:12:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series