The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
can you illustrate what you mean a little more, please?
you mean a new currency, or any currency, but with a different value?
right now a banknote is a promissory statement, and as fungible a symbol as can exist.
is there any other kind of symbol that could supplant it, that took into consideration the 'externalities' blithely dismissed with the 'deemed' value currencies presently enjoy?
i guess it will be 1's and 0's whatever form it takes in meatspace, and i guess money will not be a simple reward for creating wealth short term, but will also include an appreciation of its (symbolic) value to future generations.
my grandpa always said 'you have to learn the value of money', then when i heard how much one unit of british sterling has devalued since his time, i was really puzzled as to what he really meant.
conversations like this somewhat assuage this bewilderment. though i fumble to language exactly what i think, listening to you all is a great learning... 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
Everyone knows it's not about rational actors, or even - particularly - about credit and useful things happening because of credit.
We have an interesting situation now where stock market value seems to exist even though economic activity doesn't, much.
This makes no sense - supposedly.
I think in fact it makes perfect sense - but only if you understand what's really being traded, what the motivation for trade is, and why what happens to people who don't trade on the markets doesn't actually matter a damn.
(Except in the limit, when they start starving, rioting and burning things down.)
From there it's possible - eventually - to create new theories of value that are less subjective than the ones we have now.
We have an interesting situation now where stock market value seems to exist even though economic activity doesn't, much. This makes no sense - supposedly. I think in fact it makes perfect sense - but only if you understand what's really being traded, what the motivation for trade is, and why what happens to people who don't trade on the markets doesn't actually matter a damn.
Having read the book for a second time I think it is very relevant to out current predicament (it also contains an explanation of the business cycle as speculative bubbles, of recession as a psychological phenomenon of the business class, etc). En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
by gmoke - Aug 14 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 12 8 comments
by Oui - Aug 12 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3 4 comments
by Oui - Jul 12 52 comments
by gmoke - Aug 1
by gmoke - Jul 31 3 comments
by Oui - Aug 151 comment
by gmoke - Aug 142 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 128 comments
by Oui - Aug 129 comments
by Oui - Aug 940 comments
by Oui - Aug 716 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 34 comments
by Oui - Aug 31 comment
by Oui - Aug 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 120 comments
by gmoke - Jul 313 comments
by Oui - Jul 3016 comments
by Oui - Jul 30
by Oui - Jul 261 comment
by Oui - Jul 253 comments
by Oui - Jul 239 comments
by Oui - Jul 1971 comments
by Oui - Jul 1932 comments
by Oui - Jul 1693 comments