Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Why is there a B'ham terminus proposed for Pensacola vs. Mobile which sits at the mouth of a large inland navigable river system and already has large deep water port and rail freight facilities?

In the past passenger rail service was offered between Mobile, Bham, Atlanta and New Orleans.  

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears

by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 05:45:47 PM EST
Because the STRACNET corridor to Pensacola connects to the corridor through Mobile to New Orleans to the west, and the corridor through the Florida panhandle through to Jacksonville, to the east.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 09:53:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]
OK, sorry, now it makes sense.

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears
by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Tue Nov 17th, 2009 at 12:08:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
... the Mobile extension - it also address the Triangle-T problem by connecting the Memphis and Chattanooga corridors to the Birmingham/Nashville corridor at Decauter, so there are two through corridors, SW/Atlanta and South/Nashville.

The non-STRACNET rail corridor is in the lighter blue.

Also note that the STRACNET corridor from Mobile through to NOLA is right on the coast - AFAIU, that's where the breaks were that cut the California / Texas / Florida Amtrak service. But its in the Southeast, so there's not the variety of existing rail corridors available that we have in the Great Lakes.




I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Nov 16th, 2009 at 11:35:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series