Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
What if a Recovery Is All in Your Head?  ROBERT J. SHILLER     NYT

Beyond fiscal stimulus and government bailouts, the economic recovery that appears under way may be based on little more than self-fulfilling prophecy. Consider this possibility: after all these months, people start to think it's time for the recession to end. The very thought begins to renew confidence, and some people start spending again -- in turn, generating visible signs of recovery. This may seem absurd, and is rarely mentioned as an explanation for mass behavior late in a recession, but economic theorists have long been fascinated by such a possibility.

The notion isn't as farfetched as it may appear. As we all know, recessions generally last no more than a couple of years. The current recession began in December 2007, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, so it is almost two years old. According to the standard schedule, we're due for recovery. Given this knowledge, the mere passage of time may spur our confidence, though no formal statistical analysis can prove it.

Certainly, people did not always believe that there is a regular "business cycle" that starts and stops in a definite pattern. The idea began to spread in the popular consciousness in the 1920s and reached full bloom in the '30s -- with one major complication, the Great Depression, which received its name in midcourse, from a 1934 book with that title by Lionel Robbins.

In fact, in 1937, "Think and Grow Rich," a book by Napoleon Hill, urged readers to adopt a positive mental attitude and to channel the power of the subconscious mind so that real wealth would follow. It became a runaway best seller. Faddish interest had already emerged not only in Freud's theory of the unconscious mind, but also in the theories of the psychologist Émile Coué, who urged people to recite that "every day in every way I'm getting better and better." He said this "autosuggestion" would bolster the unconscious self.

In important ways, we are still using that 1930s pattern of thinking. We are instinctively fearful of reckless talk about depressions, and we try to support one another's confidence. We like the idea that modern scientific economics seems to show that all recessions end in due course.


My mother's copy of Think and Grow Rich remains a treasured part of my library--as an example of US popular psychology.  Sadly, it seems not to have worked for either of us. It was written by the then CEO of Ralston-Purina, a well known manufacturer of dog food. That odd fact perhaps adds a layer of meaning to former Virginia Congressman Tom Davis's comment about the Republican Party's brand image: "If our party's brand were dog food, they would be taking it off the shelves. No one is buying our dog food."  

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Nov 22nd, 2009 at 01:06:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Schiller is peddling his behavioural economics as the panacea.

The behaviour at the end of a recession can also be explained by inventories running out. People have some stuff left over lying when the recession starts and "savings" take the form of consuming this stock. When the stock runs out, you have to go out and consume.

Nobody's looking back at Minsky's (and Veblen's 80 years ago) credit theory of the business cycle.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Nov 22nd, 2009 at 03:21:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Any economic analysis that ignores Minsky and Veblen is just dog food for the guard dogs.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Nov 22nd, 2009 at 11:34:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Think and Grow Rich works for the already rich. they have ready access to cheap finance, good contacts and have a sense of entitlement that makes them pschologically equipped to deal with issues that would cause others problems.

A good example is Richard Branson. Everybody assumes he started off with nothing, forgetting that he came from the upper middle class with access to considerable resources at low cost (eg the Manor House recording studio for given to him by his aunt).

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Sun Nov 22nd, 2009 at 05:48:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]
His father being a high court judge was more important than the money. Richard took quite a few people to court in the early days of Virgin in Portobello Road. BTW The Manor was his property, but he only had a small share of the company that built, ran and owned the studio.

His basic MO until he sold the record division was to fund start-ups according to an agreed business plan that paid him max 12% ROI. (i.e. a very good return), all other profits went to the highly motivated owner/workers. However he was brutal if things didn't go according to plan. But to me this was a very smart plan.

But for all the smart business, Virgin would have disappeared without Tubular Bells.

You can't be me, I'm taken

by Sven Triloqvist on Sun Nov 22nd, 2009 at 07:24:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display: