The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
the fact that Ashton does not seem an objectionable pick per se. But it's still something of a bitter pill to have a Brit in one of these two jobs
But what do you think of the large scale campaign mounted by Britain to get one of the two jobs, and do you think that it's amongst the first countries we should look to for a candidate for these EU-wide jobs? Why did the "no one from the big countries" somehow did not apply to the UK?
And can you not admit that for some people, it was also legitimately about him being a anti-EU Brit, even if we agreed to downplay this?
In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
But alongside the debris piled up by the Iraq catastrophe, Mr Blair blew a historic opportunity to embed Britain in Europe and change the British conversation about Europe. At a time when Britons of his generation have never felt more familiar with and at ease with their European neighbours, and when so many EU arguments were going the British way, Mr Blair all but abandoned any attempt to win domestic opinion to even the pragmatic case for pooling a small portion of British sovereignty, instead capitulating to the Eurosceptic and jingoist media. On leaving office he blamed the press for forcing Britain's leaders into a false dilemma of being for or against Europe: "it's either isolation or treason". But after his landslide 10 years earlier he could have crossed the English Channel on foot. Leaders are supposed to lead.
President: Sarkozy, Merkel and Brown were evidently unwilling to put themselves forward. Berlusconi? Let's not even go there. So we turn to past leaders... Chirac, Schröder? Blair appears to have been the only one ready to put his name in the frame and to have the support of his country's current leader. That second condition is pretty crucial, since I cannot imagine circumstances in which a big country candidate could ever be considered viable without the support of the current member of the European Council. So by a process of elimination, Blair was the only big country candidate for President.
For High Rep, there were viable names available from FR and DE, but evidently Merkel and Sarkozy valued an economic portfolio in the Commission (not to mention the next ECB president in Merkel's case) more highly (and we'll find out soon enough if they get them).
The question is why did Brown decide foreign policy was more important than economics? Is there some kind of deal in place that will give him/the UK something else? Or did Barroso and the EPP gang up and tell him the UK was never going to get a senior economic portfolio?
The clear message is that someone from a small country can be forced into an EU job by peer pressure, whereas a big country leader can tell their peers to get stuffed. What's not yet clear is whether the UK is now a small country, in these terms...
At one point there was Felipe González, too.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 21 1 comment
by gmoke - Feb 28
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 19 1 comment
by Oui - Feb 18 31 comments
by Oui - Feb 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 31
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 3 3 comments
by Oui - Feb 29
by gmoke - Feb 28
by Oui - Feb 281 comment
by Oui - Feb 2815 comments
by Oui - Feb 27
by Oui - Feb 2611 comments
by Oui - Feb 261 comment
by Oui - Feb 256 comments
by Oui - Feb 243 comments
by Oui - Feb 233 comments
by Oui - Feb 23
by Oui - Feb 227 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 211 comment
by Oui - Feb 2122 comments
by Oui - Feb 203 comments
by Oui - Feb 202 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 191 comment
by Oui - Feb 1831 comments
by Oui - Feb 1717 comments