The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
You could start by reading Jerome's own FP post
Looks like Blair's persistent lobbying did open the route for the UK to grab the most important of the two new jobs. The only silver lining is that the Commissioner in charge of banking reform in the next Commission will not be British...
Crazy Horse:
And echoing Fran, it will take much to convince me that the UK, outside of Schengen and the Euro, should have been given such a supposedly key position.
Why a Brit?
How can the UK get ANYTHING?
I feel robbed, or raped.
This is pretty unbecoming...
This is disingenuous
She looks only half female to me...
RogueTrooper:
Whilst this one ebbs and flows it has been a constant during the time I have been coming to ET. It's the reason I turned into a lurker.
this was clearly the gut reaction. Then it has been rationalised in all ways
That is entirely your interpretation.
As for the others, they are based on Ashton as an official representative of the United Kingdom in the EU. Not on her Britishness as a person.
And no, this is not about frames and narratives. You are plainly exaggerating the focus of these remarks. Given Colman's top comment, I'd say he is too.
Migeru:
Whenever I have spoken for the Stop Blair! campaign I was careful to stress that it was not an anti-British campaign but an anti-Blair campaign. Maybe I was wrong.
You were not wrong (none / 0) It was an anti-Blair campaign, and not an anti-Brit campaign. But what do you think of the large scale campaign mounted by Britain to get one of the two jobs, and do you think that it's amongst the first countries we should look to for a candidate for these EU-wide jobs? Why did the "no one from the big countries" somehow did not apply to the UK? And can you not admit that for some people, it was also legitimately about him being a anti-EU Brit, even if we agreed to downplay this?
But what do you think of the large scale campaign mounted by Britain to get one of the two jobs, and do you think that it's amongst the first countries we should look to for a candidate for these EU-wide jobs? Why did the "no one from the big countries" somehow did not apply to the UK?
And can you not admit that for some people, it was also legitimately about him being a anti-EU Brit, even if we agreed to downplay this?
It's not that he was an anti-EU Brit. It's that being a Brit he proved he was anti-EU by failing to make the case for the EU to his fellow citizens when he enjoyed an immense amount of political capital.
Absolutely! I am a Frenchman who moved to the UK when it would be clear that I would not be getting any better career prospects from the move (quite the contrary in fact) and am about to go to the pub to meet a bunch of friends who, when I met them, had the reaction that I seemed British to them. I'll spend Christmas in Cheddar. I was, before moving to London, and ICC qualified cricket umpire. I have read more words in English than French since I turned 14. There is nothing in me against Brits per se -and I'm sure it's the same with the other people being quoted.
Maybe some signatures in the Stop Blair campaign came from people who genuinely hate the Brits (I'd guess it's actually directed more against the English btw), but we are not responsible for them.
Symbols and context do matter in politics. The campaign by the UK to have at all cost one of the two positions was ungainly. And as for the symbol, I may quote myself:
"For those who claim that this is being anti-Brit on sight, how do you think the UK would have reacted to seeing the command of operations in Irak given to a French general? Even a competent one mind you. Then, add to that that France would have demanded it be given the position." Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
Symbols and context do matter in politics. The campaign by the UK to have at all cost one of the two positions was ungainly.
And no, that's not about Britain. I take precisely the same line when I hear Danish eurosceptics piss and moan about the €, or hear the Danish government demand an a la carte opt out from judicial cooperation (which as it happens they only do because they want to be in Frontex but don't want to accept any of the refugees that Frontex picks up in the Mediterranean).
Although I'll grant that Britain has better reasons to not be in the € than Denmark, on account of not already being pegged to the D-mark.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Jerome asked the question Why a Brit? to answer it with the information that there was probably a trade-off for France involved:
Jerome a Paris:
It looks like the trade off is that Michel Barnier will be getting the Commissioner for the Internal Market and Financial Regulation
Crazy Horse continued his comment I feel robbed, or raped, with:
What ever has Britain done to enhance operation of the European Union?
Jérôme himself said clearly it is legitimate to be anti-Brit
I explained (in more than a little bit of detail) why it was legitimate to fight against a stronger representation of UK appointees in the top European posts, and you call that being "anti-Brit"?
And I hope you won't respond by quoting again my "anti-Brit" title because that's not an argument and you know it. In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 66 comments
by Oui - Jun 225 comments
by Oui - Jun 17 comments
by Oui - May 3145 comments
by Oui - May 3025 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2737 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1366 comments
by Oui - May 913 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 450 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Oui - Apr 2652 comments
by Oui - Apr 895 comments
by Oui - Mar 19145 comments