The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The USA could easily this problem by negotiating an agreement with China that either gets an agreement on the minimum prices at which China will sell rare earths or agreement to sell rare earths to the USA at the same price they are sold to Chinese companies and making access to the US export market contingent on that agreement. But that would be serving the national interest of the USA but not the corporate interests of the energy companies and the financial services companies involved in importing manufactured goods from China. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
I'm also sure new miners could reach long time fixed price supply deals with the large consumers of rare earth minerals, which are crucial not mainly for wind power but for hitech armaments. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
rare earth minerals...are crucial not mainly for wind power but for hitech armaments.
If they are important primarily to hitech armaments the production could be guaranteed by the US Government, but commercial products would still cost more than alternate products made with Chinese raw materials, not to mention virtually free labor. Plus any commercial use of "strategic" materials would involve the user with bureaucratic requirements, etc.
Others could better judge the likelihood of investments for rare earth mines being funded absent guarantees, but I would favor slapping an ~ 20% tariff on ANY product containing embargoed "strategic" materials. And while we are at it, phase in tariffs to cover the cost of providing health care and retirement benefits to Chinese workers. Were China to respond by dumping $US they would be hurting themselves and the Fed is already involved in massive QE anyway. What does another $2-3 trillion matter. It is fiat money anyway. Deal with consequences with new fiats. :-)
The US would have to pay more for domestically manufactured consumer goods but would have a vastly improved national accounts balance. The ones hurt would include those who bet on the "manufacture everything in China" strategy. All of the "Free Trade" "Globalization" bull shit has mostly been propaganda in the service of the financial sector. Time for an Industrial Policy worthy of the name that serves the interests of the average US citizen instead of the existing de-industrialization policy that serves the interests of a parasitical financial sector.
Chop! Chop! USA! USA! USA! "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by gmoke - Nov 30
by gmoke - Nov 24
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 11
by Oui - Dec 16
by Oui - Dec 15
by Oui - Dec 14
by Oui - Dec 13
by Oui - Dec 12
by Oui - Dec 11
by Oui - Dec 10
by Oui - Dec 9
by Oui - Dec 8
by Oui - Dec 7
by Oui - Dec 6
by Oui - Dec 61 comment
by Oui - Dec 51 comment
by Oui - Dec 4
by Oui - Dec 3