Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Please read my comment up-thread on baseload.

Why would the Commission just stare at a state like the UK, that committed energy suicide by making coincide the decommissioning of its Nuclear Programme with the decline of the North Sea Oil & Gas?

In my view that is not governing, simply letting that folk out in the cold. And do you think the same about Gas? Or about fossil fuels in general?

Finally, neither I, nor the original text approached Nuclear as a "solution" to anything. What's at stake here is the unchecked decline of this electricity baseload provider.

luis_de_sousa@mastodon.social

by Luis de Sousa (luis[dot]de[dot]sousa[at]protonmail[dot]ch) on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 04:43:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I'll have to explain some political realities here.

The Commission is the 'guardian of the treaties' and otherwise the servant of the Member States. Energy policy does not have a strong basis in the treaties. Therefore, the Commission has no leverage. The idea that it could berate a major Member State for its politically motivated energy choices, let alone block them, is comical.

As for fossil fuels, we have a policy to shift away from them. Since you're interested in my thoughts: I'd like this policy to be stronger. I'd also like to see more interconnections, storage and solidarity provisions.

by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 06:09:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
nanne:
Energy policy does not have a strong basis in the treaties. Therefore, the Commission has no leverage. The idea that it could berate a major Member State for its politically motivated energy choices, let alone block them, is comical.

boy, is that ever last century...

mind you if energy policy consists largely of squabbling between companies all racing to middleman russian gas and other imported (fossil) fuels, then no wonder...

energy self-sufficency for all europe right now as top priority, if it seems expensive now, that's nothing compared to how it will seem even in 10 years!

we are hemorrhaging capital every day to keep ugly, toxic leviathan in business lowering our quality of life as it purports to fill our 'needs'.

if our needs were met on our home ground, there would be a massive wave of simplification with respect to foreign affairs, freeing up energy to focus on other problems, while also feeling the hot breath of global warming cooling even a little perhaps.


'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty

by melo (melometa4(at)gmail.com) on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 06:21:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. We do see some movement in the right direction, but I'd want it to be faster and less muddled.
by nanne (zwaerdenmaecker@gmail.com) on Tue Feb 3rd, 2009 at 04:53:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series