The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The documented flow of refugees was to Serbia - as of the early 1990's.
The Croatian claim is that rumours coming from Serbia were the cause of the exodus. I doubt that can be documented either.
The Serbs of Croatia also took arms first, in the Log Revolution.
As a part of his plea bargain with the prosecution, Milan Babić testified against Martić during his ICTY trial, saying Martić "tricked him into agreeing to the Log Revolution". He also testified that the entire war in Croatia was "Martić's responsibility, orchestrated by Belgrade".
Biljana Plavsic also plea bargained... and today she is saying that she was 'misled' by Albright, that she misrepresented the truth in the hope of avoiding sentence.
Is this going to become another Inquisitorial vs. Adversarial justice system debate? And is the ICTY run on an inquisitorial or an adversarial system?
Although international tribunals intended to try crimes against humanity, such as the Nuremberg Trials and the International Criminal Court, have generally used a version of the adversarial system, they have also incorporated some key features of the inquisitorial system, such as the use of professional judges, and in the case of the International Criminal Court, the use of a screening pre-trial chamber.
And is the ICTY run on an inquisitorial or an adversarial system?
I checked the statute.
ICTY - TPIY :: Statute of the Tribunal
Updated Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: September 2008 (PDF format)
It's a long pdf and my result is simply that I do not know, I think I lack the legal background to sniff out the key sentences. It would appear that the court has had some room to decide its own procedures, which might mean some mix considering the mix of judges.
Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
I personally know Serbs who were driven out of Dubrovnik in 1990. While the hysteria was being propagated by all media in the region (not only Serb) there were also numerous acts of violence perpetrated against individuals. I can't say whether the media was instigating or reacting to real events.
Because of harassment.
Which harassment? Yugoslavia separated. Croatia got its independence. And that is all that Croatia wanted. There was no reason to go against people who were living in it!!!
I remember my friend Jelena who also left. According to her family harassment consisted in saying that we are living in Croatia and not Yugoslavia. So the very name was a harassment for them.
I also have some Serbian friends. Dusko, for instance, left Dubrovnik because his tourism and excursion shop was vandalized in 1990.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 23 20 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 22 1 comment
by ATinNM - Oct 19 37 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 19 113 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 24
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 11 36 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 8 126 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 6 164 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 24
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2320 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 221 comment
by ATinNM - Oct 1937 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 19113 comments
by gmoke - Oct 15
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1136 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 8126 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 6164 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 135 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 286 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 2810 comments