Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Here's Krugman's take on whether Obama is allowing Geithner & Summers enough rope>

The Geithner plan has now been leaked in detail. It's exactly the plan that was widely analyzed -- and found wanting -- a couple of weeks ago. The zombie ideas have won.

The Obama administration is now completely wedded to the idea that there's nothing fundamentally wrong with the financial system -- that what we're facing is the equivalent of a run on an essentially sound bank. As Tim Duy put it, there are no bad assets, only misunderstood assets. And if we get investors to understand that toxic waste is really, truly worth much more than anyone is willing to pay for it, all our problems will be solved.

To this end the plan proposes to create funds in which private investors put in a small amount of their own money, and in return get large, non-recourse loans from the taxpayer, with which to buy bad -- I mean misunderstood -- assets. This is supposed to lead to fair prices because the funds will engage in competitive bidding.

But it's immediately obvious, if you think about it, that these funds will have skewed incentives. In effect, Treasury will be creating -- deliberately! -- the functional equivalent of Texas S&Ls in the 1980s: financial operations with very little capital but lots of government-guaranteed liabilities. For the private investors, this is an open invitation to play heads I win, tails the taxpayers lose. So sure, these investors will be ready to pay high prices for toxic waste. After all, the stuff might be worth something; and if it isn't, that's someone else's problem.

Read it and weep.

Capitalism searches out the darkest corners of human potential, and mainlines them.

by geezer in Paris (risico at wanadoo(flypoop)fr) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 07:36:34 AM EST
geezer in Paris:
Read it and weep.

I laugh.

These people forget that they have international creditors.

I suspect that they will be reminded in London shortly in respect of who owns:

(a) their IOU's;

(b) the oil and gas.

"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson

by ChrisCook (cojockathotmaildotcom) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 08:19:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
my (ever-optimistic) friends over at the oil drum think that a real dollar crash will be inevitably accompanied by war.

In the long run, we're all dead. John Maynard Keynes
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 01:47:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]
with who?

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 03:37:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Needs to be somewhere we can build some electric railway lines to invade.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 08:05:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know, you have military bases everywhere.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Mar 22nd, 2009 at 04:26:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
So they think a dollar crash won't occur for that reason?

They tried to assimilate me. They failed.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 03:42:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
... it is, rather, zOMG we are going to have a war, because the dollar.is.s0.d00med!!!

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Sat Mar 21st, 2009 at 08:06:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series