Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
True. But this is a chicken-and-egg problem. Does the public perceive the elections as unimportant because the campaign is conducted on national issues and the parties stack their lists with small fry or old glories? Or do the parties only talk about national issues because that's where the voter interest lies. Do candidates themselves (rightly?) perceive that being in Strasbourg disconnect thems from the home country patronage networks in a way that is damaging to their careers?

It also appears the European Parliament is the original second-order election

The term has appeared for the first time in Karlheinz Reif and Hermann Schmitt's "Nine second-order national elections -A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results" article for the European Journal of Political Research, in 1980.
(Wiki)

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 04:36:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't really see how an election that is not about deciding who gets actual power can become important on its own. As long as the EP doesn't actually contest the Commission head, as long as the EP presidency is shared between the two largest parties, as long as the parties aren't all that united, as long as EP votes are decided by motivated MEPs who didn't get elected by themselves (and the MEPs that matter will either be certainly reelected or have been booted from their national lists)... The EP elections won't matter. What's the point of choosing between the 13th guy on the PS list and 20th guy on the UMP list, both guy who won't have any influence, action or even presence in Brussels ?

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 04:46:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, if the media reported properly about the activity of the EU rather than doing celebrity reporting about the Council and Barroso people would realise how important the EP actually is.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 05:23:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Even if the media correctly reported about EP activities, the elections would still lack political importance - there's only one candidate for Commission head...

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 05:50:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]
And he is unelected...

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 06:13:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Not any more or less than most Prime Ministers...

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 07:39:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, he's not even appointed by the European Parliament.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 08:42:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
In Spain it is the King who appoints the PM, in France the PM is appointed by the President and then the whole government is confirmed by the parliament... In the UK, the PM is appointed by the queen...

The power to accept or not a nomination, which the EP has if I'm not mistaken, is a power to appoint in effect. If the EP chooses to take that power.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères

by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 09:09:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It would be rare for the King, Queen or President to not appoint the (list) leader of the largest party, known beforehand. The Council has much more freedom picking the Commission President.

Then again, without a Grand Coalition in the EP... different developments would have been possible.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 09:18:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But then, the problem is that the European political scene is pretty much without strong parties ; in France in the third or fourth republics, choosing the PM among various possible candidates was the most important role of the President. Yet he had to choose one that suited the parliament. Right now the Council doesn't give a damn about the Parliament.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 09:23:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The Council is, itself, like the Senate (very much like the German Bundesrat in that the States' presidents actually sit on it, or like the Swiss Federal Council). It is a coequal organ with the Parliament and so can ignore it.

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 09:31:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Without strong parties? I'm afraig the EPP is not only the largest by MEPs and State governments but also the one that is starting to act strategically about placing their own at the top of EU institutions. (And Blair is now clearly a Christian Democrat even if he's nominally PES)

Most economists teach a theoretical framework that has been shown to be fundamentally useless. -- James K. Galbraith
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 09:34:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]
What's the voter discipline like for EPP MEP's ?

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Tue Apr 14th, 2009 at 09:46:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series