Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
oil was always foremost, obviously.  

The US did NOT expect to fight a guerrilla war, despite such a war being obvious to those outside the US Government.  This is really a matter of fact, not speculation, confirmed by internal documents even more than public announcements.  

The US DID, at the end of the invasion, secure the Iraqi oil ministry.  It was just about the only thing they did secure (aside from prime real estate in the future Green Zone) or thought worth securing.  

Revenge for 9/11 is certainly not a motive, as the US had already launched one (failing) war of "revenge," a year and a half earlier (Aghanistan).  As others have pointed out many times, Iraq had no connection to 9/11 and the US Government had to construct elaborate and clever lies to convince people that it did.  Which is to say, 9/11 was an excuse, not a motive.  

The idea about revenge for threats to Bush's dad is a story that is pricelessly cute.  No president can pursue a personal agenda that crosses the most powerful interests, as well as those of his own backers.  Can't happen.  If George really thought he was being allowed to avenge his dad, well, I'm sure he was just encouraged in his delusions.  Then again, the story might just have been more prolefeed.  

While you emphasize technical issues, and are right about those issues, such concerns were no part of the thinking of the planners--who actually thought that oil revenues would pay the cost of the war.  

The point is that the US had already been structurally bankrupt for over a decade.  The problem:  How to keep the game going.  Solution:  Create asset bubbles and borrow anew to pay off old loans and grab new sources of revenue--such as oil.  There would be no virtue to the invasion if it cost more than it yielded--economically or strategically.  

That it was a net loss on both counts is why the Republicans are no longer in office.  

MEANWHILE we have an ironic update from The Oil Drum.  Although Iraq's oil reserves may well be vast (as is almost always assumed), the easy oil is most likely mostly (some 80 %) gone.  What is left is hard-to-get oil that the war has perhaps taken off line forever.  The extensive investment that would have been needed is now augmented by war damage that would also need to be repaired and in all reasonable scenerios the requisite physical security can not be reliably maintained.  This opens an interesting possibility:  That announced American plans to leave Iraq in a few years may not be mere lies and deception.  By that time all the easy oil may have been pumped, and there will be no reason to stay.  

Some new strategy will have to be devised.  

The Fates are kind.

by Gaianne on Wed Apr 29th, 2009 at 03:58:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series