The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
My colleague Jonny Dymond has left the office for a month with a lot of wires and a long-suffering producer, but that does not mean he is ever far from my heart, or indeed my inbox and he e-mailed me this extract from David Cameron's speech the other day: "We will therefore hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, pass a law requiring a referendum to approve any further transfers of power to the EU, negotiate the return of powers, and require far more detailed scrutiny in Parliament of EU legislation, regulation and spending." "Is this a big shift of policy?" the eagle-eyed trans-European traveller wondered. After all, up until now the Conservatives have only suggested there would be a referendum if Ireland voted "no" (or the Czechs or Germans failed to complete ratification). To hold one regardless would be new, and big. But I was wary, simply because I had recently wasted a Saturday morning writing an excited blog a few weeks ago based on a news release from William Hague's office, saying much the same thing. When I read the full speech, caveats and all, I had to bin the blog. So I duly read Mr Cameron's pronouncement in full. There are no qualifications.
My colleague Jonny Dymond has left the office for a month with a lot of wires and a long-suffering producer, but that does not mean he is ever far from my heart, or indeed my inbox and he e-mailed me this extract from David Cameron's speech the other day:
"We will therefore hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, pass a law requiring a referendum to approve any further transfers of power to the EU, negotiate the return of powers, and require far more detailed scrutiny in Parliament of EU legislation, regulation and spending."
"Is this a big shift of policy?" the eagle-eyed trans-European traveller wondered. After all, up until now the Conservatives have only suggested there would be a referendum if Ireland voted "no" (or the Czechs or Germans failed to complete ratification). To hold one regardless would be new, and big.
But I was wary, simply because I had recently wasted a Saturday morning writing an excited blog a few weeks ago based on a news release from William Hague's office, saying much the same thing. When I read the full speech, caveats and all, I had to bin the blog. So I duly read Mr Cameron's pronouncement in full. There are no qualifications.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 32 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 3 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Oui - Sep 19
by Oui - Sep 18
by Oui - Sep 1715 comments
by Oui - Sep 154 comments
by Oui - Sep 151 comment
by Oui - Sep 1315 comments
by Oui - Sep 13
by Oui - Sep 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 1010 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 103 comments
by Oui - Sep 10
by Oui - Sep 92 comments
by Oui - Sep 84 comments
by Oui - Sep 715 comments
by Oui - Sep 72 comments
by Oui - Sep 63 comments