Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
"Not after it has been processed by the human mind, it doesn't"

That has nothing to do with it, no matter how you take it, as a philosophical category or as as a basis for science. Logic is at the basis of rational argumentation by definition, of scientifical argumentation, the best example being mathematics. This is the first place ever where I hear it taken for "intuitiveness" :)


Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)

by ValentinD (walentijn arobase free spot franša) on Sun May 31st, 2009 at 06:14:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually there's no such thing as a completely logically consistent mathematical system.

The consistency is patchy. You can start from axioms and build systems, but you have to accept the axioms as given. They're not provable - nor are some of the processes used to build system.

According to George Lakoff, logic is founded in cognitive psychology. Certain processes 'make sense' because they use internally consistent metaphors. The process of selecting and refining those metaphors is trial and error, and not a metaphysical revelation of philosophical truth.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Jun 1st, 2009 at 02:58:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes. I can smell some nice philosophical implications of this, concerning our methodological approach in science. Funny how little by little every thing seems to reduce to the man, in the end :)

Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)
by ValentinD (walentijn arobase free spot franša) on Mon Jun 1st, 2009 at 04:09:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series