The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
For that trust from bank to bank is necessary. The first bank needs to be sure the second bank it transfers the money to is solvent, lest the money disappear (?), and it gets sued by the depositor...
As you can see, I do not know the official linguo too well, and I think its overabundance is actually confusing. That is why I tried to stay close to the concept of deposit.
it seems to me that if a deposit (=account) disappear, the bank has failed in its most basic function. The clearing of payments is from account (=deposit) to account, so it requires the sanctity of accounts first. That is what I tried to say (certainly awkawdly).
Deposit taking institutions such as credit unions also exist, but these create no credit in the way that banks do, and have no role in the clearing system other than as clients.
So credit creation is a Bank's primary function, and deposit taking is ancillary to that purpose. The clearing of credit obligations is the same thing as the clearing of payments, and it is essential to the operation of a modern economy both in terms of the circulation of goods and services, and the creation of productive assets.
The matter of long term funding of productive assets is where secured loans and counter-balancing deposits come in. It is this part of the system which is imploding and draining credit out of the system, which adversely affects the flow of working capital as well.
"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed"
Nevertheless, that function could not exist without the capital (8%). Ancillary comes from anchor, no? The capital allows to resist to unexpected withdrawals, without borrowing in despair from the central bank.
Historically banks lent from what they had in capital. No more capital, no more lending. Applied to central banks, that was the idea of the gold standard.
It is obsolete, but as you point out, "long term funding of productive assets" is imploding because credit was given in a self feeding loop to the financial system, a bit like when an amp feeds a microphone, that makes the loudspeaker scream even louder, etc...
What has been missing is the notion of PRODUCTIVITY, indeed. Instead short term profits to "credit institutions"(whatever that means, $12 billion of TARP gift through AIG in the case of Goldman) have been confused with long term profits to society.
So society stopped being profitable, basically... Ethics is the way out.
No, it comes from ancilla which is Latin for handmaiden.
1667, "subservient, subordinate," from L. ancillaris "relating to maidservants," dim. of ancilla "handmaid," fem. dim. of anculus "servant," lit. "he who bustles about," from root of ambi- "about" + PIE *kwol-o-, from base *kwel- "move round, turn about, be much about" (see cycle).
Anyway, the initial point was whether deposits were still important or not. As a gentleman above pointed out, banks are in charge of CREATING credit nowadays, that means creating money outright. Most of the money coming out of banks is made that way, so some will view credit as the most important function of banks.
But that function cannot happen without banks having SOME capital. (The capital standards were developed by the international organization called the Bank for International Settlements, based in Basel, and famous, long ago for being kind to Nazis). Indeed if some loans fail, capital is needed.
Further, there is a distinction to be made between short-term credit secured by intrinsically valuable stuff (which essentially means the payment clearing system), short term credit that is either unsecured or secured with stuff that has no obvious intrinsic value (e.g. brokers' loans secured by stocks) and long-term credit (whether secured or unsecured).
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
The distinction between law and regulation is interesting in political philosophy. Regulation is mid way between law and interpretation.
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3 4 comments
by Oui - Jul 12 46 comments
by gmoke - Aug 1
by gmoke - Jul 31 3 comments
by Oui - Jul 19 67 comments
by Oui - Aug 9
by Oui - Aug 76 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 34 comments
by Oui - Aug 31 comment
by Oui - Aug 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 120 comments
by gmoke - Aug 1
by gmoke - Jul 313 comments
by Oui - Jul 3016 comments
by Oui - Jul 30
by Oui - Jul 261 comment
by Oui - Jul 253 comments
by Oui - Jul 239 comments
by Oui - Jul 1967 comments
by Oui - Jul 1926 comments
by Oui - Jul 1686 comments
by Oui - Jul 151 comment
by Oui - Jul 137 comments
by Oui - Jul 125 comments
by Oui - Jul 1246 comments