The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Barack Hussein Obama--President of the United States, messiah to the world, the 'chosen' one to the Left, and the dreaded 'Fuhrer-in-chief' to many of us--stated that he wants to 'bulldoze' U.S. cities that are in a state of decline. I have a suggestion for 'Dear Leader.' Start by bulldozing D.C.--not the hallowed halls of government or our national monuments but the horrid, crime-ridden, drug-infested neighborhoods of the nation's capital where thousands neither affirm nor value liberty, the rule of law, or the U.S. Constitution. For far too long the nation's taxpayers have subsidized this monstrosity in spite of the fact that it's inhabitants refuse to allow upright citizens to carry a gun and proceed to demand that they have a voting member of Congress, although they are not and never have been a 'state.' So, if the 'President of the United States,' the One with all the answers that will 'save the world,' the epitome of deep intellectual contemplation and 'rational solutions,' wishes to bulldoze those cities that are a drag on the nation, what better place to start than D.C.? Of course I would not expect Obama to even give such a thing a single thought. And of course I am engaging in sarcasm aimed at such a notion. But I hope you see the point. Most U.S. cities that are in a state of decline are in the states of the central and northern East Coast and the central Midwest in the 'rust belt.' These areas have been hit hard by recession and the failure of U.S. industry to stand firm against unreasonable demands of labor unions that have basically rendered them uncompetitive with foreign corporations. Great suffering has, indeed, ensued in these areas as a consequence of our collective errors in judgment over a very long period of time.
I have a suggestion for 'Dear Leader.' Start by bulldozing D.C.--not the hallowed halls of government or our national monuments but the horrid, crime-ridden, drug-infested neighborhoods of the nation's capital where thousands neither affirm nor value liberty, the rule of law, or the U.S. Constitution.
For far too long the nation's taxpayers have subsidized this monstrosity in spite of the fact that it's inhabitants refuse to allow upright citizens to carry a gun and proceed to demand that they have a voting member of Congress, although they are not and never have been a 'state.'
So, if the 'President of the United States,' the One with all the answers that will 'save the world,' the epitome of deep intellectual contemplation and 'rational solutions,' wishes to bulldoze those cities that are a drag on the nation, what better place to start than D.C.?
Of course I would not expect Obama to even give such a thing a single thought. And of course I am engaging in sarcasm aimed at such a notion. But I hope you see the point.
Most U.S. cities that are in a state of decline are in the states of the central and northern East Coast and the central Midwest in the 'rust belt.' These areas have been hit hard by recession and the failure of U.S. industry to stand firm against unreasonable demands of labor unions that have basically rendered them uncompetitive with foreign corporations. Great suffering has, indeed, ensued in these areas as a consequence of our collective errors in judgment over a very long period of time.
But The Examiner is present in a spectrum of political opinions in 90 cities across the USA. In addition to the cited Columbia Conservative Examiner there is a Columbia Progressive Examiner which is featuring an article entitled "Local environmental advocates fight coal plant proposal." Both these "Examiners" are in Columbia South Carolina. This is the first time I have encountered it. It is advertising for writers on its home page. It appears to be an internet based do it yourself journalism vehicle. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
These areas have been hit hard by recession and the failure of U.S. industry to stand firm against unreasonable demands of labor unions that have basically rendered them uncompetitive with foreign corporations
the heartless disingenuousness in this statement is galling.
damn workers should live on $2 p.day and like it!
often enough it's not even 'foreign' corporations, but american ones, who've offshored the work force.
cunning, hitting the unions and the furriners in one statement...
the bigger the lie, the more believable.
and so it goes... 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
Why bizarre? Because the cities he mentions are all surrounded by the richest zip codes in America, the place from which most of the wealth is generated. The northeast. The states he's pointing to are all net contributors to the tax burden, whereas the states with cities in better shape (newer cities) are all still drawing more in tax money than they contribute.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 4 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Oui - Oct 8
by Oui - Oct 74 comments
by Oui - Oct 67 comments
by Oui - Oct 56 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 24 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 121 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments