The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) has produced many silly and problematic judgements. It conceived of a right of informational self-determination, but unfortunately it has to be exercised in other peoples computers; it found that it doesn't matter whether you live off your savings (if only going through an annuity insurance) or continue receiving payments for work done perhaps decades ago – for me the coup de grâce for the capitalist order in Germany; and finally it felt that the right of the government to incarcerate people without anything resembling a proper reason should not be curtailed.
Perhaps this is another one. The court was not amused to learn that the MPs would vote away long established rights and freedoms because they "were told so." Therefore it required that the parliament give its assent to each and any (if I'm correctly informed) legislative act of the EU. This will lead to an impasse, if the EU Council of ministers decide an act against the vote of the German parliament; if the court sticks to this interpretation, the EU majority vote would have to give way to the German opinion.
But this is still, fundamentally in my opinion, only half the way. The German parliament would still suffer from the inability to introduce bills (shared by the EP, which will, however, be of lesser importance under this scheme). This is of the utmost importance, because in this situation the premium for all kind of lobbyist is increased: it is very difficult for the polity to react against a legislative act, however silly or one-sided it might be.
So this decision doesn't really point to a viable future for the EU, but only towards more complications and possible roadblocks. In fact, it might prove the death-blow for the European project.
Therefore it required that the parliament give its assent to each and any (if I'm correctly informed) legislative act of the EU.
The FAZ article linked to above indicates that the BVerG requires that the Bundestag and/or Bundesrat be consulted on, and give their positive assent to changes in the EU legislative process - and not individual acts.
Specifically, it concerns the so-called bridge-clause, i.e. the transition from the requirement of unanimous decisions at the EU level to a (mere?) qualified majority. The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by Oui - Dec 5 9 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Dec 84 comments
by Oui - Dec 620 comments
by Oui - Dec 612 comments
by Oui - Dec 59 comments
by Oui - Dec 43 comments
by Oui - Dec 21 comment
by Oui - Dec 159 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2713 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments