The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The Specter of Debt Revolt Is Haunting Europe Why Iceland and Latvia Won't (and Can't) Pay for the Kleptocrats' Ripoffs - Michael Hudson
Neither Britain nor Holland, neither the EU nor IMF have provided a scenario for just how Iceland is supposed to pay the debts that are being claimed. How much will personal income and living standards have to fall? What government programs must be cut back? How many defaults on domestic mortgages and personal debts will result, and how much unemployment? How much emigration will occur? The models being employed treat these dimensions of the economic problem as "externalities," but they are central to how the economic system works in practice. The question is whether neoliberal ideology will give way to economic reality, or whether economic policy will retain the blinders that typically characterize short-term creditor-oriented policies? What is blocking a more reasonable pro-growth policy, Ms. Joly observed, is that "the Swedish presidency of the EU does not seem to be in a hurry to improve regulation of the financial sectors, and the committees with an economic focus in the Parliament are, more than ever, dominated by liberals, particularly British liberals." So Europe continues to impose a shortsighted economic ideology. Therefore, she concluded: "Mr. Brown is wrong when he says that he and his government have no responsibility in the matter. Firstly, Mr. Brown has a moral responsibility, having been one of the main proponents of this model which we can now see has gone up the spout.
The question is whether neoliberal ideology will give way to economic reality, or whether economic policy will retain the blinders that typically characterize short-term creditor-oriented policies? What is blocking a more reasonable pro-growth policy, Ms. Joly observed, is that "the Swedish presidency of the EU does not seem to be in a hurry to improve regulation of the financial sectors, and the committees with an economic focus in the Parliament are, more than ever, dominated by liberals, particularly British liberals." So Europe continues to impose a shortsighted economic ideology. Therefore, she concluded: "Mr. Brown is wrong when he says that he and his government have no responsibility in the matter. Firstly, Mr. Brown has a moral responsibility, having been one of the main proponents of this model which we can now see has gone up the spout.
"the Swedish presidency of the EU does not seem to be in a hurry to improve regulation of the financial sectors
I would be very surprised if they had acted to regulate. So far the most visible action the swedish government has taken was in the Carnegie-affair:
Carnegie Investment Bank - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the wake of the Economic crisis of 2008 and to avoid bancruptcy Carnegie Investment Bank AB was taken over by the Swedish National Debt Office on November 10, 2008. The largest shareholders at the time was Böös & Enblad AB (9,2%), Moderna Finance AB (6,4%) and Harris Associates fonder (5,3%). In May 2009, the private equity company Altor and the investment company Bure acquire Carnegie Investment Bank AB. The ambition is to re-establish Carnegie as the leading independent investment bank in the Nordic region.[1][2] The bank had broken the law by lending too much money to one customer, property magnate Maths O. Sundqvist.[3]
Carnegie was the favourite bank for the present government when it came to organising sales of governmentally owned companies, so it was not surprising that they leaped in to save this investment company. In contrast they have clearly declared that saving Volvo or Saab by nationalisation is out of the picture.
So they seem stuck in the same frame of finance=important, production=not important as their anglo counterparts. And important of course means that it must have its freedom, not be regulated and so on... Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
When it comes to the cars, Volvo will probably survive. They make pretty good cars in an internatonal comparison and will get new owners of one kind or the other.
SAAB on the other hand is probably the shittiest auto manufacturer outside North America. There is really nothing worth saving in that company, except the technology portfolio (and even there SAAB has mainly gone for stupid ethanol). Currently the government is playing its part in the theater with the Koenigsegg front, which seems interested solely in plundering the public coffers, and the government only interested in not paying out any money to a doomed company or corporate plunderers, while neither being seen as the one which gave SAAB the mercy bullet.
And after all, Sweden does have to much of its economy focused on vehicle manufacturing (only Slovakia and Germany ahve more). Even if SAAB goes down, we'll still have Volvo PV, Volvo Trucks and Scania Trucks. Those truck companies are world class. The auto companies are not.
In a globalized economy with free capital flows we must play to our absolute advantages, not waste energy on saving industries were we won't be number one. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
And banks are special, but Carnegie was and is the typical kind of noxious bank that should be regulated away.
Carnegie Investment Bank AB is a Swedish company which specialises in stockbroking, investment banking and asset management.
Remember the crucial notion of the Glass-Steagall Act
In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, bankers and brokers were sometimes indistinguishable. Then, in the Great Depression after 1929, Congress examined the mixing of the "commercial" and "investment" banking industries that occurred in the 1920s. Hearings revealed conflicts of interest and fraud in some banking institutions' securities activities. A formidable barrier to the mixing of these activities was then set up by the Glass Steagall Act.
While stockholders were wiped out, did not managment by and large stay? As I remember it, the CEO was the only one who had to go and he was replaced by his right hand. So they saved the managment and the careers of the upper echelon in the company. Probably people they had good relations to as this was the go-to bank for privatisations.
Anyway, my critique was mainly centered on handling this crises in a way that did not show any realisation of the systematic problems. Thus, I do not think any such action should be expected during the swedish presidency. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Also, Saab was erratic and then GM made it crappy.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Anyway, I think that they could do OK on a model like Mini, by making one car and putting some effort in it instead of putting their brand on different crappy GM platforms.
In the car industry someone must be culled, and SAAB is a prime candidate. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
What Saab would need to do is look on the long term and start developing its own customised platform again instead of making somewhat fancier Opel Vectras and Insignias with poor finishing.
Besides, Saab doesn't have the capacity that needs to be cut. They only make 100,000 cars a year, and that's a target they could stick to, getting profitability by better pricing for cars with a higher standard.
100.000 cars is not enough at the prices they take today. They need 150.000-200.000 and they won't get that. The alternative is raising prices, but there's no way anyone would choose a SAAB when they could get a Lexus, BMW or Mercedes for the same price. No way.
There is a huge global overcapacity and competition is razorsharp. The herd will be culled. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
David Carnegie (entrepreneur) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
David Carnegie, Sr. (8 February 1772, Montrose, Angus - 10 January 1837) was a Scottish entrepreneur who founded D. Carnegie & Co. in Sweden, today known as Carnegie Investment Bank.
by gmoke - Jul 4
by Oui - Jul 3 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 30 26 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 16 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 51 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 14 comments
by Oui - Jul 6
by Oui - Jul 68 comments
by Oui - Jul 55 comments
by Oui - Jul 3
by Oui - Jul 31 comment
by gmoke - Jul 2
by Oui - Jun 3026 comments
by Oui - Jun 302 comments
by Oui - Jun 297 comments
by Oui - Jun 2736 comments
by Oui - Jun 2551 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2416 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 2313 comments
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments