The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
the center-left already discredited themselves and couldn't give a coherent criticism,, while the hard left couldn't step up to take its place.
So what goes on? Liberalism a la FDP isn't sustainable. While it's true that Germans have a whole hell of a lot of social safety net to burn before they get themselves into the position that Americans find themselves, it's a possibility.
And this is true basically everywhere. Certainly in the USA. When you have no coherent Left alternative, what happens?
Part of the answer seems to be that initially be that people withdraw from politics. Europe seems to be at where the US was twenty years ago in that sense.
But now in the US, people are reengaged, and still things stall along.
What happens when their is no possibility for change within the given system of politics, and pressures are building up for change within it? Rupture and reformation of a new democratic regime? Authoritarianism? Something else?
I need to get to Hannah Arendt, but I believe that some of Harvey's (the guy behind a brief history of neo-liberalism) more academic stuff gets into how liberalism turns authoritarian when it starts hitting these walls it can't deal with. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
With the creation of the Socialist Party of America, this group formed the core of an element which favored Democratic socialism over Orthodox Marxism, deemphasizing social theory and revolutionary rhetoric and in favor of honest government and efforts to improve public health. The Sewer Socialists fought to clean up what they saw as "the dirty and polluted legacy of the Industrial Revolution,"[3] cleaning up neighborhoods and factories with new sanitation systems, city-owned water and power systems, and improved education. The movement has its origins in the organization of the Social Democratic Party, a precursor to the Socialist Party of America.
In this US, the profusion of levels of government means that if you don't win on national level you can fight locally.
I have to wonder whether the Left has to be redeemed at the local level before there can be national Left alone an international Left. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
Part of the answer seems to be that initially be that people withdraw from politics.
This was the lowest participation in a German federal election, right? Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Not that the Social Democrats haven't been busy doing it for the better part of this decade. En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
while the hard left couldn't step up to take its place.
Sucks to be a Keynesian today, with such friends as the hard left, who needs enemies... Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
The thing is, with the Social Democrats having adopted the neoliberal economic consensus since the "Third Way" of 15 years ago, they are part of the cause of the crisis.
At least the FDP has not been in power while the CDU and the SPD implemented its economic ideology so they have some sort of plausible deniability... En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma
W(h)ither the Left is well worth a separate diary.
It's the most important question now.
When Keynes is seen as some kind of wacky tripped-out hippy extremist by the so-called Official Left, politics has gone far beyond plain dysfunction into outright suicidal insanity.
The way Krugman puts it, it's remarkable what the conventional wisdom says about Keynes...
Keynes did not, despite what you may have heard, want the government to run the economy. He described his analysis in his 1936 masterwork, "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money," as "moderately conservative in its implications." He wanted to fix capitalism, not replace it. But he did challenge the notion that free-market economies can function without a minder, expressing particular contempt for financial markets, which he viewed as being dominated by short-term speculation with little regard for fundamentals. And he called for active government intervention -- printing more money and, if necessary, spending heavily on public works -- to fight unemployment during slumps.
We are too ignorant either of what individual agency in its best form, or Socialism in its best form, can accomplish, to be qualified to decide which of the two will be the ultimate form of human society. If a conjecture may be hazarded, the decision will probably depend mainly on one consideration, viz. which of the two systems is consistent with the greatest amount of human liberty and spontaneity.
If a conjecture may be hazarded, the decision will probably depend mainly on one consideration, viz. which of the two systems is consistent with the greatest amount of human liberty and spontaneity.
It's not about whether their policies have been tried or not. It's about them being able to claim that their policies have not been tried. All they need is a sufficiently big fig leaf that their tame newsies can keep a straight face while they pretend to take their insanity as wisdom.
And if you pay your tame newsies enough, "sufficiently big" is very small indeed.
But hey, at least Siemens make trains that actually run. That's still better than what the Italians and Americans have to show for their lunatic far-right parties...
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 3 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 3 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 23 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 115 comments
by Oui - Oct 120 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Oui - Sep 266 comments
by Oui - Sep 251 comment
by Oui - Sep 252 comments
by Oui - Sep 2410 comments