Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
And purely on economic grounds, they are correct to reject it - Offshore wind is a lot more expensive to build than on-shore wind, and the increased capacity factors do not, at the current state of the art, make up for this. Which means, that for a country willing to build new nuclear capacity, any ventures into offshore wind would plain and simply cost to much.  Never mind anything else, the price per kwh is just too high. It will likely come down, but whether it will come down faster than on-shore wind (unlikely), or hell, nuclear (well, I expect the price on reactors to come down. I have trouble convincing people of this) is an open question.
by Thomas on Mon Jan 18th, 2010 at 07:26:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
French accounting for nuclear costs is, creative.
by rootless2 on Mon Jan 18th, 2010 at 09:21:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series