The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So, what are you saying, Chavez wouldn't, but "the US" does? I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears
Recently read a good piece.
Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
Sunstein is currently Obama's head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs where, among other things, he is responsible for "overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs." In 2008, while at Harvard Law School, Sunstein co-wrote a truly pernicious paper proposing that the U.S. Government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-"independent" advocates to "cognitively infiltrate" online groups and websites -- as well as other activist groups -- which advocate views that Sunstein deems "false conspiracy theories" about the Government. This would be designed to increase citizens' faith in government officials and undermine the credibility of conspiracists. The paper's abstract can be read, and the full paper downloaded, here.
Consider the recent revelation that the Obama administration has been making very large, undisclosed payments to MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber to provide consultation on the President's health care plan. With this lucrative arrangement in place, Gruber spent the entire year offering public justifications for Obama's health care plan, typically without disclosing these payments, and far worse, was repeatedly held out by the White House -- falsely -- as an "independent" or "objective" authority. Obama allies in the media constantly cited Gruber's analysis to support their defenses of the President's plan, and the White House, in turn, then cited those media reports as proof that their plan would succeed.
To prove that the US government is behind stories about unfriendly leaders is hard, but means, motive, opportunity and a pattern of behavior is there.
I am not sure what you meant by "Chavez wouldn't". I bet he would love to plant stories about US leaders but I doubt he has the means. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Gringo:
The fact that most governments engage in disinformation operations is nothing new. A spirited defense of the honorable Hugo Chavez against malicious or even erroneous reporting is nothing to complain about. However, to question a leap from one thing to another that provides not a shred of evidence, as in the comment to which I replied, is at least understandable. It makes me think someone is more interested in supporting a particular position/person than the facts. I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Sat Jan 23rd, 2010 at 11:52:41 PM CET [ Parent | Reply to This | ]
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 6 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Oui - Oct 13
by Oui - Oct 12
by Oui - Oct 121 comment
by Oui - Oct 112 comments
by Oui - Oct 11
by Oui - Oct 10
by Oui - Oct 101 comment
by Oui - Oct 9
by Oui - Oct 91 comment
by Oui - Oct 81 comment
by Oui - Oct 8
by Oui - Oct 74 comments
by Oui - Oct 67 comments
by Oui - Oct 56 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 42 comments
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 26 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments