Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
This is a common tactic used against leaders the US does not approve of.

So, what are you saying, Chavez wouldn't, but "the US" does?

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears

by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Fri Jan 22nd, 2010 at 11:22:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That the Bush government planted stories is probably nothing I need to find sources for. That the Obama government does is probably no shock either.

Recently read a good piece.

Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

Sunstein is currently Obama's head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs where, among other things, he is responsible for "overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs."  In 2008, while at Harvard Law School, Sunstein co-wrote a truly pernicious paper proposing that the U.S. Government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-"independent" advocates to "cognitively infiltrate" online groups and websites -- as well as other activist groups -- which advocate views that Sunstein deems "false conspiracy theories" about the Government.  This would be designed to increase citizens' faith in government officials and undermine the credibility of conspiracists.  The paper's abstract can be read, and the full paper downloaded, here

Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

Consider the recent revelation that the Obama administration has been making very large, undisclosed payments to MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber to provide consultation on the President's health care plan.  With this lucrative arrangement in place, Gruber spent the entire year offering public justifications for Obama's health care plan, typically without disclosing these payments, and far worse, was repeatedly held out by the White House -- falsely -- as an "independent" or "objective" authority.  Obama allies in the media constantly cited Gruber's analysis to support their defenses of the President's plan, and the White House, in turn, then cited those media reports as proof that their plan would succeed.

To prove that the US government is behind stories about unfriendly leaders is hard, but means, motive, opportunity and a pattern of behavior is there.

I am not sure what you meant by "Chavez wouldn't". I bet he would love to plant stories about US leaders but I doubt he has the means.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Sat Jan 23rd, 2010 at 07:35:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Gringos answer got hidden because of a spam rated comment in between.

Gringo:

The fact that most governments engage in disinformation operations is nothing new. A spirited defense of the honorable Hugo Chavez against malicious or even erroneous reporting is nothing to complain about. However, to question a leap from one thing to another that provides not a shred of evidence, as in the comment to which I replied, is at least understandable. It makes me think someone is more interested in supporting a particular position/person than the facts.  

I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. _ Blood Sweat & Tears
by Gringo (stargazing camel at aoldotcom) on Sat Jan 23rd, 2010 at 11:52:41 PM CET
[ Parent | Reply to This | ]


Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by A swedish kind of death on Sun Jan 24th, 2010 at 06:36:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series