Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Colman affirms that reading (thus knowing) Christian Holy Scripture wouldn't in any way change his mind that this scripture is inherently EVIL. This Holy Scripture inspired 15-20, perhaps 25 billion people (all generations since the 8th century to today) to produce some of the most stunning architecture, music, visual arts, literature and philosophy in the Western world. But for Colman, it's all about EVIL. 1 smart guy out of 20 billion idiots. No doubts. 100% certain. Arrogant? Spot on.

I have no comment regarding your other baseless accusations.

by Lynch on Fri Oct 22nd, 2010 at 01:51:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That wasn't what Colman said.

You claimed that calling a religion evil implied ignorance of its scriptures. Or, making the same statement in a slightly different order, reading a religion's scriptures automatically makes you believe that it is not evil. Otherwise, you asserted, one is "close-minded."

Now, there's a couple of different reasons why simply reading a religion's scriptures might not suffice to convince an open-minded person that said religion is not evil. First and simplest, the scriptures might be evil. This is the case for the pseudo-economic doctrines of the so-called "Austrian School," for instance. The more thoroughly an open-minded person reads their scriptures, the more liable he is to become disgusted with them and renounce their creed as evil.

Second, a religion's scriptures are a minor and on the whole uninteresting part of it. They certainly cannot in and of themselves redeem a religion that should be condemned on its actions and practises. Even if Dianetics were the most beautiful literature ever written, it would not change the fact that Scientology is a Ponzi scam with a bad attitude.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Oct 22nd, 2010 at 02:16:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course.
Except that this diary is neither about Scientology nor Dianetics.
It's about Christianity.
by Lynch on Sat Oct 23rd, 2010 at 11:03:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No it's not about "Christianity", try again.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Oct 23rd, 2010 at 11:06:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I could go back over the last five to ten comments in this particular exchange and highlight all the places where you made general claims about religion. But I feel entirely comfortable with allowing the reader to peruse this thread at his leisure and form his own opinion on the contents.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Oct 23rd, 2010 at 11:36:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yes, Scholasticism was such a win compared to that mindless gibbering the Greeks produced.

The Middle Ages were also known for the breathtaking sophistication of their sculpture, drama, music, visual arts, technology and mathematics.

In reality idiot theocracy held back development by a millennium or so. It wasn't until the Greeks were rediscovered that Western culture started moving again.

True, some of the cathedrals aren't bad, although the architecture is obviously a descendant of imperial Roman building traditions.

It's a shame the people who built them were confused.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Fri Oct 22nd, 2010 at 02:29:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Ulster says NO!

by Frank Schnittger - Oct 17
27 comments

Trump's Presidency Transfixed

by ARGeezer - Oct 17
7 comments

Spain is not a democracy

by IdiotSavant - Oct 14
10 comments

Does anyone care?

by Frank Schnittger - Oct 10
71 comments

Occasional Series