The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
When the system does not say a thing as to where its Maker comes from, it is obvious the said Maker is fundamentally exterior to the system.
"I am talking about reconciling inconsistencies between your own values"
When was that the topic under discussion again.
Let me remind you my point: I am arguing that religions and ideologies belong to the same category, in spite of some striking differences such as those concerning supranatural beings.
Forging yourself a way out in your usual sophistically sophisticated manner again ? :)
"So if I can offer a contradiction between what you claim are your values"
have not discussed my values here, sorry; this is getting boring.
"You have claimed that you do not have an ideology. Which, as far as I can tell is perfectly true.
This is not, however, praiseworthy. It means that your values, as far as they have been presented here, appear to be a jumbled mess"
Have you made a fixation on my humble person? Get a hold of yourself, man.
Back to the topic pls: ideologies = religions.
"absent any plausible mechanism for how the spirit realm works, it is not reasonable to suppose that it is a plausible explanation for any unexplained phenomena"
I tried to reduce the problem of distinguishing ideologies and religions to the existence of a spiritual world. But pay attention here, I did not actually claim it exists.
My point was: IF it exists (for instance, in a way similar to that described by the string theory), then it takes all that awful magic out.
If it doesn't, and Colman is correct in calling them delusions (not impossible; humans do have a propensity to idealistic stories and personification of things), then, since all the contesting parts are only existing in human imagination, we can safely disregard them and focus on the fundamentals, ie, religions and ideologies are basically the same thing.
Now if you can produce some relevant thoughts on this (preferably without recurring to jabs about my values etc), please do so; otherwise, forever remain silent! :)
"Come back when you've solved a tensor equation or two"
Now you've actually hit the nail on its head. I used to be an expert in all that differential geometry stuff, way way back in my uni years. Okay, maybe not an Expert, but I did have a way around manifolds. Yet tensors, I never really liked, dunno why.
Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last! (Martin Luther King)
by Oui - Oct 11 16 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 10 59 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 8 67 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 11 11 comments
by Oui - Oct 8 17 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 27 29 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 26 26 comments
by Oui - Oct 1116 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 1111 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1059 comments
by Oui - Oct 817 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 867 comments
by Oui - Oct 329 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 223 comments
by Oui - Oct 25 comments
by Oui - Oct 1
by Oui - Sep 2872 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 2729 comments
by gmoke - Sep 26
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2626 comments
by Oui - Sep 2538 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24114 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 2472 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 2420 comments
by Oui - Sep 247 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 191 comment