Game theory aside, it shows that humanitarian values are no cornerstone if they can be abandoned like this.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

Well, I learned of his views at the stage he had Eurabia visions and made historical comparisons, that's at least paranoid.

his 1991 keynote editorial

Do you have some on-line link that can be fed more easily into Google translate?

_{*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

In Amsterdam schorste het GVB onlangs een trambestuurder omdat hij een christelijk kruis droeg op zijn uniform. Het dragen van een islamitisch hoofddoekje boven datzelfde uniform is wel toegestaan. De tramconducteur werd door de rechter in het ongelijk gesteld.

An Amsterdam tram driver was kicked out for wearing a crucifix over his uniform, but the same company doesn't prohibit the Muslim veil above the uniform, Bolkestein claims. But he forgot certain details:

Court backs ban on tram driver's crucifix | Radio Netherlands Worldwide

A tram driver, Ezzat Aziz, had brought the case because his employer had forbidden him from wearing a necklace bearing a Christian cross outside his uniform. He had been suspended several times for wearing the necklace.

Mr Aziz claimed he been subjected to unequal treatment. He said that while he was not allowed to wear his necklace, there was no ban on Islamic women employees wearing headscarves.

However, the court sided with the Mr Aziz's employer. The Amsterdam public transport service pointed out that its employees are not allowed to wear necklaces of any kind, with or without religious symbols. They are allowed to express their religion visibly in other appropriate ways, such as by wearing a bracelet or ring. The court concluded that the rules were reasonable and there was no question of any religious discrimination.

Conductor banned from wearing crucifix necklace | Radio Netherlands Worldwide

An Amsterdam appeal court has ruled that the Amsterdam public transport service is within its rights to ban its conductors from visibly wearing a necklace bearing a crucifix.

...The court ruled that the public transport service wasn't guilty of discrimination because the rule wasn't against wearing religious symbols, but simply against visibly wearing necklaces. For security reasons the service's dress code bans employees from wearing any necklace outside the uniform.

The dress code allows the wearing of headscarves, as long as they bear the company logo. And the transport service points out that if Mr Aziz wants to express his religious belief, he's welcome to wear a ring or an earring with a crucifix.

Nevertheless, Mr Aziz says he's disappointed in Dutch justice. As a member of the Coptic Church, in Egypt he was barely able to express his religion. He expected things to be different in the Netherlands.

Een Nederlandse advocaat weigert op te staan als de rechter binnenkomt omdat hem dat door zijn godsdienst, de islam, verboden wordt. De desbetreffende rechter, Peter Ingelse, zei dat de advocaat mocht blijven zitten, omdat hij, Ingelse, zich niet beledigd voelde. De rechter vergat daarbij dat advocaten niet moeten opstaan uit respect voor de rechter, maar uit respect voor de wet.

Bolkestein tells the story of a Muslim lawyer in the Netherlands, who concluded from a Koran passage that standing up for someone who enters a room constitutes disrespect for people as equal, and thus refused to stand up when judges enter. Bolkestein then scolds the judge for tolerating it just because he did not feel insulted in his person, whereas standing up should be about showing respect to the law not his person. Well, that's both plagiarism and apparently a severe mis-representation of Ingelse's argument:

LMS-blog

According to the Lawyers Association, Mohammeds refusal contravenes the rules of the court. 'A lawyer should 'pay respect' to the court. Not to judges as persons, but to the court as part of the rule of law.'

There is no legal rule however that says what 'paying respect' looks like. According to the dean of the Lawyers Association 'standing up when the court enters is the common way of showing respect'.

...Judge and Vice-President of the court of appeal of Amsterdam Peter Ingelse wrote in NRC (one of the larger national newspapers) on 8 September, that lawyers in the seventies and eighties bowed before the court. "Some almost kissed the floor", he said. Ingelse himself was a so called first aid lawyer, providing 'access to law' for poor people out of ideological reasons. "We did not like this bowing at all, so we just did not do it." He was convinced that 'respect' could only be earned and deserved, not enforced. Looking back now at his behaviour then, he concludes that respect for the court has not diminished, even if every now and then he sees persons in court refusing to stand up. He is more afraid of future diminished respect because of a forced way of enforcing rituals in court.

De Haagse Hogeschool heeft een kerstboom laten verwijderen uit angst dat moslimstudenten dit christelijke symbool (sic) aanstootgevend zouden vinden.

He claims Hague University banned the Christmas tree out of respect for Muslim students. The truth:

The Dutch higher vocational school `Haagse Hogeschool (HHS)` (calling itself The Hague University - but don't be fooled, it's not a university), has banned the christmas tree from its school. Well, contrary to many reports, not every where, but in in the main entrance hall. According to HHS they wanted a more international approach for the coming holidays so they choose `light' as a broad and positive theme expressed in light curtains, new years card and a charity action that fits more with the diverse character of its population. In other parts of its building there are christmas trees.

Engeland laat zien dat het nog erger kan. Daar heeft de gemeente Oxford besloten Kerst af te schaffen en te vervangen door het `Winterlichtfestival'.

Oxford supposedly abolished Christmas and replaced it with Winter Lights Festival. Here Bolkestein merely bought into a typical British media hysteria.

Oxford Inspires' Statement on WinterLight

We are sorry that a distorted and inaccurate portrayal of the WinterLight Festival in the press has given offence to people, and that the event itself has been so maligned.

WinterLight is a festival of winter events which happen from mid November to early January across Oxfordshire, many of which incorporate candlelight, fire or illuminations. Across Oxfordshire WinterLight features many Christmas events including Christmas Lights Switch Ons, a Christmas Festival and an Advent Fair. It also includes winter events such as pantomime shows, opera on ice and music concerts by candlelight.

 

WinterLight Oxford on 28th November coincides with the city`s Christmas Lights switch on event and with the re-opening of Bonn Square. WinterLight is happening in addition to Oxford City Council's Christmas programme which includes Christmas trees, Christmas Lights and the annual Carol Concert.

 

WinterLight does not distance itself from Christmas in the slightest. Oxford Inspires has not suggested removing the word "Christmas" from festive events. It has never considered doing so. The "WinterLight" publicity brochure features a Christmas tree on the cover and is in the format of an Advent Calendar with windows opening to reveal events.

In Neukölln, een stadswijk van Berlijn waar veel moslims wonen, zou een tentoonstelling worden gehouden over `De Derde Wereld in de Tweede Wereldoorlog'. Een klein deel van de tentoonstelling ging over de medeplichtigheid van Arabieren aan misdaden van de nazi's. Na protesten van moslims werd de tentoonstelling gesloten. De Berlijnse wethouder van integratie Günter Piening zei: `In een gemeenschap als Neukölln hebben we een gedifferentieerde voorstelling nodig van de betrokkenheid van de Arabische wereld bij de Tweede Wereldoorlog.'

Bolkestein tells of an exhibition about the Third World and WWII which was supposedly closed at the pressure of local Muslims protesting the showing of Arab Nazi collaborators. This is completely off, from Muslim through conflict parties to being closed:

He continues like this but my comment is long enough. Every single one of his examles are distorted to fit his argument, and the Dutch ones can't even be ascribed to a good faith misreading of distorted media reports. Sarrazin's way of arguing was the exact same.

_{*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

I finished just three pages out of ten, but already I don't like it. Nothing yet about integration; he is talking about ups and downs of civilisations in sweeping tones, agrees as a liberal to Delors's contention that Christianity is one of the three bases of European civilisation with a sleight of hand and a mocking of Turkey, then goes into listing the illiberal ills of the Muslim world without considering any factors other than religion, and blaming all conflicts involving Muslims (with Israel at the end of the list) on the Muslims -- essentially, the worldview behind Huntington's Clash of Civilisations. So I'm sorry but it very much seems to me that he had the idée fixe about the Muslim Problem two decades ago already.

_{*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.}

And yet, here is one sign that Germans remain quite reflective of the potential ultimate consequences of racism and xenophobia in their recent past:

Hitler Exhibition is a Visitor Magnet / Hitler-Ausstellung ist Besuchermagnet | Berliner Morgenpost - Soenke Schierer (2010.10.20)

In five days, already 15,000 people have come to the German Historical Museum.  The primary attraction for visitors is not the dictator himself, but rather his effect on the population.

It's 11 o'clock in the morning.  The German Historical Museum has been open for one hour.  Though the queue to get in keeps moving, it is nevertheless quite long.  The reason for this is the exhibition: "Hitler and the Germans.  The National Identity and Wrongdoing/Crime".  Since the start of the exhibition on Friday, more than 15,000 visitors have seen it.

The interest is great, and among all age groups.  After one hour, in a queue that already goes to several corners around the museum, young families with children, couples, and older people are waiting to bear witness to history.  Even 65 years after the end of the Second World War, Hitler and National Socialism obviously remain a subject that affects people. <...>

According to the museum, the exhibition is not just a striking display of the events of the Nazi period.  Nor is Hitler alone its main focus.  The exhibition deals much more with the dictator's effect on the population, and that is the subject which the visitor is meant to explore.  In this way, Germany society under National Socialism and its significance in Hitler's domination are also examined.  Hitler's ascent from an unremarkable character in younger years to an unscrupulous politician obsessed with power was made possible largely and even foremost through the population.

The Title Invites Questioning

This is precisely what Rudolf Trabold, spokesperson of the German Historical Museum, sees as another key factor of the exhibition's success so far.  "The name of the program was selected quite consciously.  Each person must feel personally spoken to.  After all, each of us contributes to the "national identity [i.e. People's Community]".  Back then just as today.  The significance of that period's political-social conditions is extensively highlighted. The mobilization of social fears and hopes, which was so decisive for Hitler's party and his power political goals, is a central theme. ...

____________

In fünf Tagen sind bereits 15.000 Menschen ins Deutsche Historische Museum gekommen. Der Diktator selbst spielt bei den Besuchern nicht die tragende Rolle - vielmehr ist es seine Wirkung auf die Bevölkerung.

Es ist elf Uhr am Vormittag. Das Deutsche Historische Museum hat seit einer Stunde geöffnet. Zwar geht es merklich voran, die Schlange der auf Einlass Wartenden ist aber trotzdem schon lang. Der Grund dafür ist die Ausstellung: ,,Hitler und die Deutschen. Volksgemeinschaft und Verbrechen". Seit Ausstellungsbeginn am vergangenen Freitag haben sie schon mehr als 15.000 Besucher gesehen.

Das Interesse ist groß und das in allen Altersklassen. In der Warteschlange, die schon nach einer Stunde um mehrere Ecken des Museums reicht, stehen Jugendliche, Familien mit Kindern, erwachsene Paare und ältere Menschen, die durchaus Zeitzeugen sein könnten. Auch 65 Jahre nach dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs bleiben Hitler und der Nationalsozialismus offensichtlich ein Thema, das die Menschen bewegt. <...>

Nach Angaben des Museums bildet die Ausstellung nicht einfach plakativ die Geschehnisse der Nazizeit ab. Auch ist es nicht Hitler alleine, der die tragende Rolle in der Ausstellung spielt. Vielmehr geht es um die Wirkung des Diktators auf die Bevölkerung, die der Besucher erforschen soll. Und dabei wird auch die deutsche Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus und ihre Bedeutung für die Herrschaft Hitlers untersucht. Der Aufstieg Hitlers - in seinen jungen Jahren eine unscheinbare Persönlichkeit - zu einem skrupellosen, besessenen Machtpolitiker ist zu großen Teilen auch erst durch die Bevölkerung ermöglicht worden.

Titel macht neugierig

Genau darin sieht Rudolf Trabold, Pressereferent des Deutschen Historischen Museums, auch einen der Schlüsselfaktoren für den bisherigen Erfolg der Ausstellung. ,,Der Name ist Programm und bewusst so gewählt. Jeder soll sich angesprochen fühlen. Schließlich sind wir alle Teil der Volksgemeinschaft. Damals wie heute." Die Bedeutung der politisch-gesellschaftlichen Umstände der damaligen Zeit wird ausführlich beleuchtet. Die Mobilisierung sozialer Ängste und Hoffnungen durch Hitler, die für seine partei- und machtpolitischen Ziele entscheidend war, sind ein zentrales Thema. ...