The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The huge computer companies, like HP and Dell get copy-cat products made in China and sent from there around the world, for which the scrape a few percent for the right to use their logo.
The oil companies make sweetheart deals to siphon petroleum from around the world and deliver it to the rest of the world (except, typically, from where they drain it from), for which they scrap a huge percentage.
The banking cartels who siphon the american public's money so that they can play with it for a while and siphon off a huge percentage.
These provocations then require that the USians subsidize the enormous "need" for keeping a hegemony over their trading areas with a military that is larger than everyone else's combined, while selling more arms around the world than everyone else combined. (I wonder if that is a coincidence.)
All that to say, the imperial core gets money to perpetuate the game, and an ever smaller percent of ruthless rich get a steady flow of profits, but there are few who get anything else but scrapes.
Oh. That's what 'core' means. Uhm, I guess I just made the point you made earlier and much more succinctly. Sorry. I can't give you back the minute you spent reading this. Never underestimate their intelligence, always underestimate their knowledge.
Frank Delaney ~ Ireland
Despite our economic problems and questionable politics, if the metric is global influence, the U.S. is still up there...
Microsoft's last decade has been an epic history of constant R&D failure. Successful MS-branded R&D, like Kinect, was actually bought in from outside.
Apple plays this game too. Apple is far more successful as a packaging, marketing and industrial design corporate than as an R&D factory. Apple's two key skills are being a monopoly that can span different market segments and link them together, and collaging ideas that have been developed to a reasonable level of polish by third parties.
Amazon finished most of its critical systems development a decade ago. The only new product is a scalable server business, and that's not exactly on the technical edge. Likewise Kindle and ePub which have been around as ideas for a decade or so. (I was talking to my then-publisher about ebooks in 1998.)
eBay is also stuck around 2000, and the software seriously sucks. But it has a de facto monopoly, and there's no real incentive to develop it further.
Google does real R&D but its product labs are spread around the world.
The fact that HP's R&D was raped by Fiorina and Dell is a packager is evidence of the contrary - a lack of serious interest in R&D in most of corporate America.
What the US has is a de facto monopoly in many areas - search engines, core networking, e-commerce, desktop software, and so on.
But the corporations that own the monopolies are actually multinationals. And creating a monopoly is one of the best ways to end useful innovation. You're often left with something that looks like R&D, but most of the time it produces non-threatening incremental rather than dynamic change. (See also Adobe, Intel, and so on.)
Msdos? The product that made the company what it is today? Bought from Seattle Computer Products.
Excel? Bought.
Windows? Developed at PARC (1970-1975,) developers hired by Apple for the Lisa (started in 1978,) and MicroSoft copied it and jumped in with Windows 3.0 ... in 1990.
There are some first class people doing first class work but management insistence on a 3 month pay-back time horizon shoots the ability to sit and think and fail. Which is the sina qua non of research. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
There are some first class people doing first class work but management insistence on a 3 month pay-back time horizon shoots the ability to sit and think and fail. Which is the sina qua non of research.
Besides, one of the dirty little secrets of publication is that as long as your paper is intelligible, you can usually find a journal that will publish it after a couple of tries. In a pinch, you can submit it as a conference poster. So there are safety valves for failed projects, although of course they should not be called upon too often.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Looking only at big companies doesn't really do much though. I think most of the real innovation in America is done at universities. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by IdiotSavant - Jun 24 11 comments
by Oui - Jun 25 42 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 16 15 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 10 15 comments
by Bernard - Jun 6 23 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 6 4 comments
by Oui - Jun 8 104 comments
by Oui - Jun 29
by Oui - Jun 2720 comments
by Oui - Jun 2542 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 2411 comments
by Oui - Jun 2310 comments
by Oui - Jun 23
by gmoke - Jun 22
by Oui - Jun 20
by Oui - Jun 1916 comments
by asdf - Jun 184 comments
by Oui - Jun 184 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jun 1615 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1512 comments
by Oui - Jun 1310 comments
by Oui - Jun 1240 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1015 comments
by Oui - Jun 95 comments
by Oui - Jun 8104 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 64 comments
by Bernard - Jun 623 comments