The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
There's already plenty of discussion and debate about policy and politicians. It wouldn't need a Separate Public Oversight Committee with people in scary robes and fascist black leather - debate would happen naturally, just as it does already, but more so.
Why would that be a bad thing?
As for "having something to hide", the point is that pols notoriously do have things to hide - many, many things, which they would rather the public never found out about. The things they hide suck out democracy and public involvement from politics like the legislative equivalent of a black hole.
Do you think the FOIA legislation is authoritarian too? Or Finland's public financial disclosure laws? Is Wikileaks authoritarian for making diplomatic cables public?
If a cabinet meeting decides X, but Y becomes policy instead then it's not hard to see that something has gone astray somewhere.
But, usually, backroom deals take place before meetings where decisions are made. So there would be no discrepancy between a decision made during the meeting and the policy implemented...
I am all in favour of FOIA, but you must notice that there is a period of time during which you cannot access the information/data. And Finland's law is limited to a certain type of information, whereas you would like to make public in real time "all the discussions and meetings".
What I am saying is this would require a STASI-like organisation. And who would monitor this organisation? How long would it take before this organisation become the real power? "People only accept change when they are faced with necessity, and only recognize necessity when a crisis is upon them." - Jean Monnet
You set up live feeds, and you put the media recordings up on a server. The public and the press can do the rest.
I'll say again - there is no Bureau of Transgression in this idea. It's purely to put policy debate on the record.
As for backroom deals - a meeting that rubber stamps a decision without debating it is just as suspicious as a meeting which doesn't lead to consistent policy.
Financial records provide a literal paper trail for anyone who wants to check who benefits from decisions.
I don't understand why there's a problem with any of this. Parliamentary debates are already televised in the UK, Hansard keeps a record of all parliamentary statements in paper form, and MPs are supposed to make their expense claims and business connections public.
This is just extending the same established principle to other government contexts.
Like the meetings of the general assembly of shareholders in a large industrial corporation.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
What I am saying is this would require a STASI-like organisation. And who would monitor this organisation?
Make it the law that acceptance of governmental employment constitutes permission to have your activities recorded by sound and video, and, except as specifically excluded, it is legal to make any of these recordings public. Make the legal presumption in favor of release of recordings and make claims to the contrary continuously subject to judicial review, with both the party that made the recording and the party that was recorded entitled to bring claims to a judge of their choice. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 14 32 comments
by Oui - Jan 10 58 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jan 15 20 comments
by Oui - Jan 21 6 comments
by Oui - Jan 20 29 comments
by Oui - Jan 20 4 comments
by Oui - Jan 16 6 comments
by Oui - Jan 13 88 comments
by Oui - Jan 216 comments
by Oui - Jan 2029 comments
by Oui - Jan 204 comments
by Oui - Jan 172 comments
by Oui - Jan 166 comments
by gmoke - Jan 16
by IdiotSavant - Jan 1520 comments
by Oui - Jan 1432 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1432 comments
by Oui - Jan 1388 comments
by Oui - Jan 1177 comments
by Oui - Jan 1058 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 877 comments
by Oui - Jan 772 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 710 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 668 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 611 comments
by Oui - Jan 659 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 230 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3151 comments