Ruling Party Melt-down and the End of the EU project in Ireland | 144 comments (144 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: No one! (4.00 / 2)

Those things certainly would help. An FDR type audit of all the banks -- for real -- not a bunch of phony stress test PR exercises. But still, being able to accurately model even the shape of the curve for various economic parameters that would result from various actions would be helpful. Even with three sector dynamic models Steve acheives that. Calibrating the response will take longer. Especially if he is the only one doing it.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 01:52:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No one! (4.00 / 3)

Lots of things might be helpful. But the response to a currency run or an intervention against a TBTF bank is something you can drill even if your macroeconomic models are shit. You can simply download a bank's balance sheet and declare this or that asset class to be so-and-so much impaired (or, if you want an extra layer of realism, only give this information to the referee, and have people figure it out on their own from trying to "sell" the assets to the referee).

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 02:26:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And as an aside... (4.00 / 2)

... I don't want the central bank or financial regulator to be doing macroeconomic modelling. I want them to kill financial bubbles, I want them to kill aggressive accounting in the financial sector, I want them to make sure that depositors' money isn't used for gambling and I want them to take insolvent banks through bankruptcy.

Macroeconomic modelling is the Treasury's job. The CB and FR do not need macroeconomic models to do the jobs I want them to do, and if they feel the need for the results of macroeconomic modelling, they can ask the Treasury to do a run for them. Macroeconomic policy is properly the Treasury's turf, and I don't want the CB and FR developing a parallel capability in that area. That would almost inevitably lead lead to a sort of mission creep that I consider harmful in an institution that is traditionally not particularly democratically accountable.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 02:39:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (none / 1)

OK then, let the treasury use models that actually work.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 02:56:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (4.00 / 3)

You know I'm with you on that.

But good macro is preventative more than it is curative. What I'm talking about here is crisis management, and you don't need good macro models for that - all you need is a firm political will to screw over bondholders and use the power of the sovereign to restore full employment. After you've arrested the rise in unemployment, you can start firing up your macro models to develop medium-term policies.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 03:06:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (4.00 / 3)

To my knowledge, current as of 2007, the relation between macroeconomic models and policies and their determinative affect on microeconomic activity has never been proven. All papers demonstrating such are ex post facto.

If there IS a paper I'd be eager to read it.

She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre

by ATinNM on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 03:05:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (4.00 / 3)

Damn it all.

I meant an NCE paper.

There are UnSerious People who have written such.

She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre

by ATinNM on Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 at 03:11:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (none / 1)

I don't want the central bank or financial regulator to be doing macroeconomic modelling.

In the case of Ireland and Greece, were capable macro modeling of the sort I suggested performed on the "resolutions" imposed by the ECB and IMF in those cases, it would be clear what an ineffectual disaster the policies would be and that the chief result will be gratuitous damage to the societies involved via a debt-deflation death spiral. Use of such models would only strengthen the hand of the IMF, who, interestingly, seems to have been the voice of moderation in these cases, not having banks for which it is directly responsible which might take a haircut on bonds they hold.

One of the advantages of having useless theories and models is that it facilitates an Alice in Wonderland situation in which everything means exactly what the relevant authority says it means.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Dec 4th, 2010 at 12:41:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (4.00 / 2)

But I don't want central banks to recommend structural adjustment programmes and fiscal austerity. That's none of their business. They're there to kill insolvent banks and print money for the government. That's all I want them to do. The fact that the ECB is the entity with the greatest influence on federal-level EU macroeconomic planning is a disgrace and a perversion of the proper way to run an industrial state.

The IMF is a different sort of story - they should be doing macro, and they should be doing it right. (But they should never have been involved in an internal €-zone crisis in the first place...)

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Dec 4th, 2010 at 01:32:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And as an aside... (4.00 / 2)

And I wholly agree with this. We need a reassertion of the political in political economy. But, given the existing presumptions, economics has to be governed entirely by its own internal rules -- no matter that this is bunk, has never an will never really work -- at least for the good of the overall society. Supposedly autonomous economics HAS been a very effective smoke screen for the looting of societies, however.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sat Dec 4th, 2010 at 05:06:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ruling Party Melt-down and the End of the EU project in Ireland | 144 comments (144 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

The path to a united Ireland

The Making of A Rebellion

Italian government collapse

China Releases Trump's Deck of Cards

A New Dawn In America

Forever Corruption and A Pardon

Dutch Government Collapse

U.S. Capitol Trump Insurrection - Act 2

Recent Diaries

China Releases Trump's Deck of Cards

A New Dawn In America

Forever Corruption and A Pardon

A Rush To Judgement Day

Dutch Government Collapse

Solar Decathlon Webinars

Italian government collapse

Israel and A Presidential Election

The path to a united Ireland

U.S. Capitol Trump Insurrection - Act 2

Pence Lacked Courage, Succumbed Under Pressure

The Making of A Rebellion

A Long War?

Calls to Remove Trump

Covid-19 out of control in Ireland

Coup Attempt in USA?

Georgia on my mind (Part 2)

Georgia Turns Blue, Insurrection @Capitol

Born to rule

Blaming others for England's isolation [Update]

Occasional Series