Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that they've made up the numbers on purpose.

It's just that this kind of international comparison is not trivial. To take an obvious example, South Korea boasts of a 20 % of GDP "education budget" - but they include primary and secondary schools in that figure!

Similarly, if less blatant, at anything below postgraduate level, there are structural and organisational differences between Europe and the US that make comparisons a non-trivial exercise.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Feb 12th, 2010 at 05:14:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Another thing to keep in mind is where the applied science is done. When Vestas develops a new alloy, they do it in-house. I don't know what the American system is in that respect, but given the reputation of places like Lawrence Livermore for pay-for-play research for the armaments industry, I suspect that the mix is different.

Whether it is desirable to have the applied science lodged with universities is a subject of ongoing debate, of course, but it's one of the things that needs to be kept in mind if we want to make apples-to-apples comparisons.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Feb 12th, 2010 at 05:21:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think that same article I linked to put European R&D at 2% GDP and American R&D at 2.5% so not that much of a difference at all.
by Upstate NY on Fri Feb 12th, 2010 at 06:18:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series