Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Federal-level economic governance is not supposed to be geared towards the good years.

Any moron (except, apparently, Silvio Corruptioni) can manage an economy during the good years. Which is what Bush the Lesser and his friends capitalised on.

But I think that the reference to Corruptioni touches the nub of the issue: The reason we have the GSP is that Germany didn't want to hand Italy the power to run €-denominated deficits indefinitely. And while I can't say I blame them for that, I do think that the solution would be to not include Italy in the €-zone, rather than making up some ad hoc criteria with little connection to reality.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Feb 12th, 2010 at 03:55:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
But, to include or not include countries in the eurozone is the sort of question that makes the eurozone an excellent free trade area but not really a political union. The reality is that it's still going to be incredibly hard for German or French or any taxpayers to pay for Greek taxpayers, even though that kind of solidarity would seem to be required with a convergence of economies, in a totally integrated union.
by Upstate NY on Fri Feb 12th, 2010 at 06:46:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Politically it should be easier to do than for Iceland, Greece actually being in the Euro and all, but somehow I doubt it will be.

I wonder how Germany's treatment of Greece will influence Croatian [just to name the presumed next entrant] feelings about EU accession, and whether Germany cares.

En un viejo país ineficiente, algo así como España entre dos guerras civiles, poseer una casa y poca hacienda y memoria ninguna. -- Gil de Biedma

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sat Feb 13th, 2010 at 02:29:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series