The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
however, to the degree offshore is being used in the UK to ignore onshore development, it is a false step. When onshore is being strongly developed, with significant annual capacity installations, then the pressure is off higher-risk offshore, and the industry can grow at a more healthy pace until it reaches maturity.
eggs, meet sole basket.
Hypothetically, it's possible the 126+ m rotor turbines need another generation or two to reach adequate performance levels. Offshore slows down or even halts a year or three, then what? (I'm not saying this is even likely, but there is no question the larger turbines are reaching unexplored territory. Even the 90-100m rotor turbines have not reached full maturity yet.)
Case in point, the Crown Estate is invested in the Clipper 10MW turbine. Clipper has an advanced design drive train, which took several years to reach operational status after first commercial installation. While many prominent engineering analysts now claim that Clipper is back on track, i personally believe there's not yet a long enough data period to be confident they've solved the technical problems. If that's the case with their 2.5 MW machine, what's to come with a 140m 10MW machine.
Clipper has assembled a top design team behind Amir Mikhail, and seems to have significant R&D funding secured. if a proper prototype, testing and data analysis period is allowed BEFORE rollout, we could have a winner. But the 2.5 was rolled out too soon, as are most turbines. (GE 2.5 an exception.) There's too much pressure to expand on offshore currently.
But J. is closer than I to industry sentiment, so i'll defer to his views here. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Yes, but don't you get that windturbines are a horrible blight on the landscape. At least for the twits who still wish that they could go fox hunting.
Point taken. I imagine that you are right that the promise of what offshore might be able to do is being used to stop onshore from doing what we know it can.
Case in point, the Crown Estate is invested in the Clipper 10MW turbine.
140 meter rotors? That's big. What's the hub height on something like that? I suppose that if you are invested in offshore, that you may as well pump up the size as much as possible. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
As you may well know, Econcern went bust last year. Eneco took over their core activities, but I don't know about any plans in the pipeline... I don't expect much from companies as Nuon and Essent.
I'm still under the impression that there will be at least 3 new coal plants built. I don't find much news on this after a quick google search.
IOW: The Dutch suck at wind.
And there are actually plans for 4 coal plants... (RWE, Nuon, Electrabel and E.On)
A bit of good news at least.
by IdiotSavant - Jan 15 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 14 12 comments
by Oui - Jan 16 4 comments
by Oui - Jan 13 57 comments
by Oui - Jan 17 1 comment
by gmoke - Jan 16
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 8 77 comments
by Oui - Jan 14 21 comments
by Oui - Jan 171 comment
by Oui - Jan 164 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jan 1514 comments
by Oui - Jan 1421 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1412 comments
by Oui - Jan 1357 comments
by Oui - Jan 1177 comments
by Oui - Jan 1046 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 877 comments
by Oui - Jan 772 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 710 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 668 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 611 comments
by Oui - Jan 659 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 229 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3151 comments
by Oui - Dec 3122 comments
by Oui - Dec 2834 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28