The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As we look forward, we ask, who now determines the variation margin on Greek CDS (and Portugal, and Dubai, and Spain, and, pretty soon, Japan and the US), the associated recovery rate, and how much collateral should be posted by sellers of Greek protection? If Greek banks, as the rumors goes, indeed sold Greek protection, and, as the rumor also goes, Goldman was the bulk buyer, either in prop or flow capacity, it is precisely Goldman, just like in the AIG case, that can now dictate what the collateral margin that Greek counterparties, and by extension the very nation of Greece, have to post on billions of dollars of Greek insurance. Let's say Goldman thinks Greece's debt recovery is 75 cents and the CDS should be trading at 700 bps, instead of the "prevailing" consensus of a 90 recovery and 450 spread, then it will very likely get its way when demanding extra capital to cover potential shortfalls, since Goldman itself has been instrumental in covering up Greece's catastrophic financial state and continues to be a critical factor in any future refinancing efforts on behalf of Greece. Obviously this incremental margin, which only Goldman will ever see, even if the CDS was purchased on a flow basis, will never be downstreamed on behalf of its clients, and instead will be used to [buy futures|buy steepeners|prepay 2011 bonuses|buy more treasuries for the BONY $60 billion Treasury rainy day fund]. In essence, through its conflict of interest, its unshakable negotiating position, and its facility to determine collateral requirements and variation margin, Goldman can expand its previous position of strength from dictating merely AIG and Federal Reserve decision making, to one which determines sovereign policy! This is unmitigated lunacy and a recipe for financial collapse at the global level. In essence, through its conflict of interest, its unshakable negotiating position, and its facility to determine collateral requirements and variation margin, Goldman can expand its previous position of strength from dictating merely AIG and Federal Reserve decision making, to one which determines sovereign policy! This is unmitigated lunacy and a recipe for financial collapse at the global level. This is yet another AIG in the making, with Goldman this time likely threatening to accelerate the collapse not merely of the US financial system, but of the global one, in order to attain virtually infinite negotiating leverage. Of course, the world will not allow a Greece-initiated domino, allowing Goldman to call everyone's bluff once again.
In essence, through its conflict of interest, its unshakable negotiating position, and its facility to determine collateral requirements and variation margin, Goldman can expand its previous position of strength from dictating merely AIG and Federal Reserve decision making, to one which determines sovereign policy! This is unmitigated lunacy and a recipe for financial collapse at the global level.
This is yet another AIG in the making, with Goldman this time likely threatening to accelerate the collapse not merely of the US financial system, but of the global one, in order to attain virtually infinite negotiating leverage. Of course, the world will not allow a Greece-initiated domino, allowing Goldman to call everyone's bluff once again.
If there is an agency of the European Union that acts to protect Union members from financial fraud and predation, it could do Greece, the EU and the world a giant favor by declaring the whole CDS market corrupt and unenforcable. That would greatly lessen the pressure on Greece, Ireland, Spain and Portugal AND, as a feature, not a bug, possibly blow up Goldman-Sachs. But I dream. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Isn't it perhaps not completely wise to advertise a short position when it would be so easy to subvert it?
I suppose it would be criminal of the ECB to take a counter-stake and then announce a debt guarantee.
Incidentally, doesn't Goldman's position and media campaign meet the definition of economic warfare?
doesn't Goldman's position and media campaign meet the definition of economic warfare?
wouldn't the EU or even Germany stepping in to guarantee Greek debts blow up Goldmans,then?
However, if the Commission suspects that Goldman or any other player has cornered the market, or is attempting to do so, it is perfectly within its mandate to bring the competition and inner market hammer down, like it did on Intel and Microsoft. Given the - ah - less than perfectly transparent, shall we say, nature of these instruments, it is possible that simply making vigorous noise about punitive measures will suffice to stimulate a run on the target.
That might be a more productive venue.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
if the Commission suspects that Goldman or any other player has cornered the market, or is attempting to do so, it is perfectly within its mandate to bring the competition and inner market hammer down, like it did on Intel and Microsoft
Times Online [UK]: Citigroup agrees to pay £14m over bond scandal (June 29, 2005)
Last August Citigroup sent shockwaves through the eurobond market after executing a series of huge bond trades, which destabilised the market and for a moment sent prices plunging. By exploiting the price moves and the ensuing panic, Citigroup traders made profits of £9.96 million in the course of the day. The bank's reconfigured computer program, designed to stun the market with a blast of 188 simultaneous sell orders, was known by the traders as "Dr Evil".
The market was thrown into confusion on 2 August 2004 when Citigroup pushed through EUR11 billion in paper sales in two minutes over the automated MTS platform. As the value of futures contracts fell and traders moved to cover their positions, Citigroup re-entered the market and bought back about EUR4 billion of the paper at cheaper prices. The strategy was dubbed Dr Evil, after the Austin Powers character, in an internal e-mail circulated by the traders. Immediately afterwards MTS moved to impose temporary limits on the value and volume any one dealer can push through the system at a time. MTS also suspended Citigroup from trading on its bond network for one month after finding that the UK bank breached certain market regulations. The UK's Financial Services Authority later fined Citigroup £13.9 million following its investigation into the controversial trading.
Immediately afterwards MTS moved to impose temporary limits on the value and volume any one dealer can push through the system at a time. MTS also suspended Citigroup from trading on its bond network for one month after finding that the UK bank breached certain market regulations.
The UK's Financial Services Authority later fined Citigroup £13.9 million following its investigation into the controversial trading.
I'm sure these traders have a lot of fun at their job, but shouldn't it occur to them that what you're doing might be a shade on the grey side of acceptable behaviour when the most apt pet name for the scheme makes reference to a wave-motion gun or earth-shattering kaboom?
What is it with trading desks and code names?
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 19 19 comments
by Oui - Sep 13 35 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 5 comments
by Cat - Sep 13 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 2 comments
by Oui - Sep 302 comments
by Oui - Sep 29
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 2618 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 242 comments
by Oui - Sep 1919 comments
by gmoke - Sep 173 comments
by Oui - Sep 153 comments
by Oui - Sep 15
by Oui - Sep 1411 comments
by Oui - Sep 1335 comments
by Cat - Sep 139 comments
by Oui - Sep 127 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 115 comments
by Oui - Sep 929 comments
by Oui - Sep 713 comments
by Oui - Sep 61 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 22 comments
by gmoke - Sep 2