Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Since thorium reactors are supposed to run by a constant addition of neutrons to get the isotopes that splits faster, they should be able to run at variable levels. That is, from a physics standpoint. From an engineering perspective I think it would require that the setup is constructed to run at variable power with variable flow of everything (things has to balance and such).

So I think it could work as top load, if designed for it.

What is the development status of thorium reactors btw?

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 03:24:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What is the development status of thorium reactors btw?

That I don't know.

My interest is in terms of strong sustainability, where I don't view a lifestyle on an energy budget relying on technology that cannot be propagated outside a select group of core economies as long-term sustainable. Core economies can't avoid proselytizing for their lifestyle and standard of living among semi-peripheral and peripheral economies, after all.

So a fuel cycle without the proliferation concerns of the common fuel cycles might qualify as something more than a medium term stop-gap.

And if it qualifies as something more than a medium-term stop-gap, then it might have the basis to claim support as an infant industry that existing nuclear technologies do not have.


I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 at 08:17:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series