The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
A Belgian parliamentary committee has voted to ban face-covering Islamic veils from being worn in public.The home affairs committee voted unanimously to endorse the move, which must be approved by parliament for it to become law. Such a vote could be held within weeks, correspondents say, meaning that Belgium could become the first European country to implement a ban. France is also considering restricting face-covering veils. There are several types of headscarves and veils for Muslim women - those that cover the face being the niqab and the burka.
A Belgian parliamentary committee has voted to ban face-covering Islamic veils from being worn in public.
The home affairs committee voted unanimously to endorse the move, which must be approved by parliament for it to become law.
Such a vote could be held within weeks, correspondents say, meaning that Belgium could become the first European country to implement a ban.
France is also considering restricting face-covering veils.
There are several types of headscarves and veils for Muslim women - those that cover the face being the niqab and the burka.
The ban is partly grounded on security concerns, demanding that all people must be identifiable by the authorities when in public.But parliamentarians also explained the vote on grounds of "fundamental democratic principles and the dignity of women", comparing the full veil to a "walking prison which is not adapted to Belgian values".
The ban is partly grounded on security concerns, demanding that all people must be identifiable by the authorities when in public.
But parliamentarians also explained the vote on grounds of "fundamental democratic principles and the dignity of women", comparing the full veil to a "walking prison which is not adapted to Belgian values".
Such a ban may be defensible on security enforcement grounds. Otherwise, it is the first step onto a slippery slope towards totalitarianism in which the state (1) decides what pieces of clothing symbolize, (2) decides whether those symbols are compatible with "state values", (3) outlaws any ideologically "incompatible" pieces of clothing, and (4) uses these laws to stigmatize, bully and incrementally ostracize targeted groups within society.
"We have sent a very strong signal to Islamists," said Denis Ducarme, a centre-right member of parliament.
I find it absurd in the extreme that these morons are claiming to uphold "the dignity of women" by pushing them even deeper into their oppressive culture of origin.
But of course this is only about fear and ethnic/cultural purity. The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by gmoke - Jun 6
by Oui - Jun 16
by Oui - Jun 161 comment
by Oui - Jun 1511 comments
by Oui - Jun 14
by Oui - Jun 13
by Oui - Jun 12
by Oui - Jun 11
by Oui - Jun 104 comments
by Oui - Jun 101 comment
by Oui - Jun 99 comments
by Oui - Jun 93 comments
by Oui - Jun 86 comments
by Oui - Jun 717 comments
by Oui - Jun 62 comments