The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Oil, Not China, Is The Real Destroyer Of America's Trade Balance UBS's head of Asia-Pacific economics argues that the real global trade imbalance isn't U.S.-China, it is U.S.-oil. As shown below, current account surpluses from fuel exporting-nations have been a far larger driver of total global trade imbalances coming from emerging markets. (...) Thus the U.S. could use a little less finger-pointing at China... and a lot less foreign oil usage... if it really wants to correct its global trade imbalance. This is a huge argument against U.S. trade protectionism since protectionism would miss the largest cause of America's trade deficit while only hurting U.S. export prospects by pissing off trade partners.
UBS's head of Asia-Pacific economics argues that the real global trade imbalance isn't U.S.-China, it is U.S.-oil. As shown below, current account surpluses from fuel exporting-nations have been a far larger driver of total global trade imbalances coming from emerging markets.
(...)
Thus the U.S. could use a little less finger-pointing at China... and a lot less foreign oil usage... if it really wants to correct its global trade imbalance. This is a huge argument against U.S. trade protectionism since protectionism would miss the largest cause of America's trade deficit while only hurting U.S. export prospects by pissing off trade partners.
I always appreciate when people make this comparison, the relative weight of Chinese and oil imports in the US trade balance, that there's hardly a word about how one of the things driving up the cost of US energy imports is new demand from China.
Production in China is much more energy intensive than in the United States, and that's before you look at the cost of shipping products 10,000 miles to market....... And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
Production in China is much more energy intensive than in the United States, and that's before you look at the cost of shipping products 10,000 miles to market.......
Citation needed.
See for example Wikipedia's List of countries by Energy Intensity
for the year 2003. It is given in units of tonnes of oil equivalent per million constant year 2000 international dollars.
by gmoke - Nov 11
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 6
by gmoke - Oct 27
by Oui - Nov 14
by Oui - Nov 13
by Oui - Nov 12
by Oui - Nov 11
by Oui - Nov 103 comments
by Oui - Nov 9
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 64 comments
by Oui - Nov 52 comments
by Oui - Nov 4
by Oui - Nov 24 comments
by Oui - Nov 2
by Oui - Nov 14 comments
by Oui - Oct 31
by Oui - Oct 301 comment