The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That's the question we should be answering but we can't. And once we answer that we have to worry about how to get there from here. The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
one's easier -- just live it up, have a nice boom, and hope that the bust happens to our kids and grandkids instead of us. yippee, party hearty, discount the future, damn the torpedoes.
one's harder.
might call it the Yeast Party vs the Redwood Party: we can grow like blazes, pig out on any bonanza of nutrients or energy with no thought for tomorrow... or we could aim to be a climax anchor species whose activity provides -- rather than destroying -- habitat for many others... unfinished thought... gotta run... The difference between theory and practise in practise ...
one's easier -- just live it up, have a nice boom, and hope that the bust happens to our kids and grandkids instead of us. yippee, party hearty, discount the future, damn the torpedoes. one's harder.
now, now with yer binaries!
conceptually, it's easily that stark, but down in the real world TM too much hairshirtism leads to atrophy of the will.
as for partying hard, that can be more or less sustainable...
i think of those african tribes out in the desert, barely two sticks to rub together, but still doing a boogie round the fire under the stars.
get too far out and no-one but the already initiated can relate to you.
sometimes you have to let it all hang out, or the efforts to be exemplary can cause a nasty stress of its own.
both/and. this era is tragically funny, and horribly hilarious.
still something good to celebrate there, for want of better choice...
the very meaning of the word 'growth' has to change, from that of a (once-benign, but now metastized) tumour to intellectual growth, since that's what makes us different (if not yet better!) than the rest of mammalia.
that might be your cup of tea, De.
drunk out there rocking on the water under the banshee moon.
;) 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
I dunno from definitions, but I call that 'whole-brain-use', or own responsibility for 'personal growth'. IMHO, all human 'capacities and potential' reside in the brain including feeling, creativity, imagination, emotion, intuition,... besides rational thought processing, and the endless combinations. If any of us had had a 'sane' upbringing, we would have developed the neuron discipline to find our 'best mix', guided by basic social values, but I think most of us got blocked, shorted and conditioned in many areas.
So we live trying our best to grow and develop: the best balance of all of them in ourselves and the best place to put them to good use.
Dreamer (; Our knowledge has surpassed our wisdom. -Charu Saxena.
i loved your comment, mv, because it reminded me how male this insistence on the word 'intellect' is, like the mind is some kind of rocket probe to go higher and higher into the vast firmament of the unknown.
while i do want to help celebrate the intellect, i am very aware that the very term falls into a (very male) trap of separation.
and i'm aware that intellect is historically value-neutral, without respect and wonder, humility and proportion, it can lead us into hell and drop us off there with no ride home.
intellect for me can be found in an illiterate bedouin shepherd, it's not a product of academia, though western education can burnish it, notwithstanding the cultural conditioning.
maybe we have to discover the intellect in order to transcend it (another male obsession, btw), or better celebrate it equally with energies from the other pole, a sensuous use of the brain for pure art-delight, seeing its use also in say figure skating, distinguished from its ivy league, ivory tower connotations. the term has become so loaded, it can be compliment or epithet depending on pov.
i think we need it to comprehend abstract notions, a castalia in which to ponder issues of weight and great nuance that can be lofty enough to leave the gritty everyday world far behind, and therein lies the trap.
intellectual freedom, the bugaboo of tyrants through history is what i think we crave, yet, it's an not unironic truth that ultimately the intellect must get in line with all the other faculties we master and possess, or it will warp and become bent.
...as will a character whose will to intellectualise has been devalued, perhaps by an anti-intellectual parent or peer pressure.
once grown there can be a huge resentment at people who have developed their brains while still flexible enough to do so, a stoking rage that they missed a bus, and now it would be unimaginably hard to correct, like taking up violin at 90!
this bloodlust is what i see blazing in the teabagger movement, fr'example. they look at a leader like obama, and the realisation that the very (self-)education that they eschewed when they could have made something of it is personified in a black(ish) man, who three generations ago they could have called 'boy' and sent to the back of the bus...
you're so right though, it's much more about wholebrain-thinking and balance than mere garlanding the intellect, which without moral grounding can be devastatingly destructive, though it's hard to not see equal capacity for destructivity in power-without-intellect, such as was hallmark of hitler, pol pot, stalin and mao.
when you want unthinking followers, slaying intellectuals who may invite freedom of thought in the lumpenproletariat is a .....-no-brainer', lol.
Idealist (; 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
<sigh>
The depth of the crash is still undecided. The Fates are kind.
James Taylor 'Secret of life' 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
Migeru: That's the question we should be answering but we can't. And once we answer that we have to worry about how to get there from here.
So you are not satisfied with Herman Daly's suggestions?
(Neither was Georgescu-Roegen, if I read him right.) The point is not to be right, but to get to right.
I'm satisfied with his framework, but you'll notice rdf ends his diary with
Since I've been a big fan of his goals and a critic of his lack of implementation ideas, this seems a good step forward.
we're boxed into the "go back to freezing in caves by candlelight" story. Half the battle of getting there from here lies in persuading people they want what's proposed.
....preferably without them having to freeze outside a cave without any candles first, before they get it.
it's taken millions of years to get this stupid! 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
That's the question we should be answering but we can't. And once we answer that we have to worry about how to get there from here.
i don't find visualising more realistic and sustainable futures difficult, but the second part of your statement completely stumps me. i prefer the word 'concern' to 'worry', as it is more positive, but that's PN.
a combination of chris' ideas and sven's marketing might be a good start! 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
The greater the affective strength of a variable - such as population growth - the sooner the system will move.
She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
And what makes you think a human culture or economy is not dissipative? The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
Look at the good old classic example: Chaco Canyon. They built a system under marginal conditions using a technology that increased population requiring a further deployment of that technology. For a couple of hundred years they were able to meet and solve adverse weather conditions - no rain - by intensifying the use of that technology. Then they ran into a situation were the challenges they had to meet could not be met with the level of technology they had developed. The result was a collapse of the Chaco Canyon culture, the population it supported, and an abandonment of the area by the remaining population.
It's possible to find "steady-state" societies, a good one is New Guinea. But these can only continue over long periods of time under isolation with minor, non-system affective, technological development. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Tribal cultures tend to do all of the above. This makes them inherently sustainable, but very static. You can leave a tribal culture alone for a few thousand years, and when you come back the people will doing the same things, eating the same food, telling the same stories and singing the same songs.
This looks secure but it depends on environmental stability. If the climate changes or if there's a disaster, these cultures have mixed prospects of adaptability. Without a tradition of innovation they may not be able to adapt.
Force-based cultures don't believe in the steady state. Survivability is enhanced through innovation.
But in fact the West is a mixed culture. It believes in force and change in everything except politics and economics (which is just politics with numbers).
There's vanishingly little political innovation in Western history. You can compare the Roman Empire or Greece to the US Senate, and they're recognisably similar. Rome had its redistributive land reform economic populists like the Gracchi, and they weren't any more successful than ours have been.
So in fact rather than looking for tribal self-sufficient nostalgia, a technological fix or a big die-off, I'd suggest that the way to make Western culture sustainable is to eliminate steady-state politics and economics.
This doesn't mean revolution in the Marxist sense, but it does mean making politics and economics more open-ended, chaotic, innovative and participative, and not based on the old tribal assumptions.
Our real task is to persuade people to give up the technological addiction ahead of the descent into that level of self-destruction.
But recovery from addiction is a spiritual process.
If humans remain the center of human concern, recovery is not possible, since in that mindset arguments against the convenience of exploitation cannot be countered.
If, contrariwise, humans can devote themselves to non-human-centered, life affirming goals and processes, the doorway to recovery will stand wide open. The Fates are kind.
I simply don't see that that's true. The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
Meditation is a technology.
I disagree with you, Meditation is a state of being, which you can also achieve without techniques. :-)
If, by that, one is postulating a dynamic system where all State/Condition variables and constants give rise to a dynamic stasis. The key word there is "dynamic."
intriguingly paradoxical.
it brings to mind a comment someone made to me that there was a long period of british history where not much happened, all the records are there, and inspection reveals a normal, humdrum period of peace in the shires.
meanwhile the continent was knee deep in carnage.
something to do with being an island, i guess.
anyway, i was speculating how to the brits, that period wasn't dull at all, there was plenty to do and reasons to do it, without invaders breathing down their necks, or social upheavals. in fact the everyday might have been much more fully lived in a healthy way, without those unpleasant distractions the history books are so full of.
a steady state society would aim for this, consciously, imo.
in some discussions here, i seem to remember taking away a figure of 4% as annual natural yield resource multiplication, if those resources are stewarded responsibly.
if we learned to be happy with that, we could have our precious growth, just like if banking returned to being boring, they could still live well without scamming us.
looking at the way things are panning out now, 4% seems amazingly generous, but in a global atmosphere where madoff-like profits were touted as the new norm, it seems like....b-o-r-i-n-g.
eating the seedcorn, burning the furniture, all about us, wanna wanna wanna.
what will it take to make us grow up and harmonise our existence with our habitat, instead of cudgelling it into subjugation? 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
by gmoke - Nov 30
by gmoke - Nov 24
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 11
by Oui - Jan 17
by Oui - Jan 16
by Oui - Jan 15
by Oui - Jan 151 comment
by Oui - Jan 14
by Oui - Jan 141 comment
by Oui - Jan 132 comments
by Oui - Jan 13
by gmoke - Jan 138 comments
by Oui - Jan 12
by Oui - Jan 122 comments
by Oui - Jan 11
by Oui - Jan 112 comments
by Oui - Jan 10
by Oui - Jan 101 comment
by Oui - Jan 9
by Oui - Jan 8
by Oui - Jan 83 comments