Rating Agencies Considered Harmful | 91 comments (91 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: Sounds easy ... (4.00 / 3)

Becuase they can short and/or insure their own loans if the insurance and/or short is in danger of becoming more profitable than the potential loan loss.

And without proper regulation and oversight they might be encouraged to do so.

Hypothetically.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 02:51:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (none / 1)

Hypothetically? Hasn't the Great Vampire Squid already done just that?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 02:57:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (none / 0)

I was being ironic. :)

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 03:18:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (none / 1)

So, uh, can't we just ban that?

And how in gods name can they short a non-securitised loan they have issued themselves?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 04:04:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (4.00 / 2)

One way is to swap the interest and principle payments for the loan bank A made for the interest and principle payments of a different loan that bank B made. And banning that, or regulating it very severely rather, is precisely what is being proposed in the US banking reform legislation in Sen. Blanche Lincoln's version. The banking industry is resisting it full bore, however, since that kind of insurance trading is how so many US banks posted their most profitable years on record last year, during the worst banking crisis in 70 years.

by santiago on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 04:32:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (4.00 / 2)

Becuase they can short and/or insure their own loans if the insurance and/or short is in danger of becoming more profitable than the potential loan loss.

This, however, requires that the sucker who is on the other end of the deal hasn't done his risk analysis properly.

Which really speaks more to the need for keeping widows and orphans out of the capital markets than to any need to rein in the capital markets' tendencies to separate suckers from their money. Because the former is possible - the latter may very well not be.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 05:19:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Rating Agencies Considered Harmful | 91 comments (91 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

Poots to lead DUP - where?

Intergenerational Justice - Updated 15/5/21

Why Fear Deficits?

Goodbye Arlene Foster

Thwarting Kremlin Attacks by Tatars, French and Germans

Uyghur Muslim Ethnic Separatism in Xinjiang

Macron Islam Policy Facing Mutiny

Online Ecovillage Talks

Recent Diaries

Human Rights

Frank's Diary Index: US Politics

9. Global economics, politics, foreign policy and war.

Poots to lead DUP - where?

Days of Kahane Terror Returns

Intergenerational Justice - Updated 15/5/21

Palestinian Rights and E Jerusalem

Social Contract, EU-27 Last Stand - Porto 2021

Are we in a Post Capitalist World?

Resetting US-China Relations ... Again

Uyghur Muslim Ethnic Separatism in Xinjiang

Goodbye Arlene Foster

Why Fear Deficits?

Outcry for Genocide Should Be Universal

Macron Islam Policy Facing Mutiny

Thwarting Kremlin Attacks by Tatars, French and Germans

Global Tentacles of Palantir Spread to EU

Online Ecovillage Talks

Keir Starmer Is Sinking In Leadership Role

Solar Public Service Announcements

Occasional Series