Rating Agencies Considered Harmful | 91 comments (91 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: Sounds easy ... (4.00 / 3)

Becuase they can short and/or insure their own loans if the insurance and/or short is in danger of becoming more profitable than the potential loan loss.

And without proper regulation and oversight they might be encouraged to do so.

Hypothetically.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 02:51:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (none / 1)

Hypothetically? Hasn't the Great Vampire Squid already done just that?

The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter

by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 02:57:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (none / 0)

I was being ironic. :)

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 03:18:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (none / 1)

So, uh, can't we just ban that?

And how in gods name can they short a non-securitised loan they have issued themselves?

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 04:04:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (4.00 / 2)

One way is to swap the interest and principle payments for the loan bank A made for the interest and principle payments of a different loan that bank B made. And banning that, or regulating it very severely rather, is precisely what is being proposed in the US banking reform legislation in Sen. Blanche Lincoln's version. The banking industry is resisting it full bore, however, since that kind of insurance trading is how so many US banks posted their most profitable years on record last year, during the worst banking crisis in 70 years.

by santiago on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 04:32:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds easy ... (4.00 / 2)

Becuase they can short and/or insure their own loans if the insurance and/or short is in danger of becoming more profitable than the potential loan loss.

This, however, requires that the sucker who is on the other end of the deal hasn't done his risk analysis properly.

Which really speaks more to the need for keeping widows and orphans out of the capital markets than to any need to rein in the capital markets' tendencies to separate suckers from their money. Because the former is possible - the latter may very well not be.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Mon Apr 26th, 2010 at 05:19:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Rating Agencies Considered Harmful | 91 comments (91 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

World Wide Electricity Super-grid

Zero Net Energy - January 19, 2022

Mandatory vaccination

Dutch Battle Omicron Surge vs Delta

Political Sectaranism in Northern Ireland today

Alcoholism and drink prices

Russian Position Talks with US, NATO and OSCE

Almaty - Kazakhstan

Recent Diaries

Mitch un-American and True Patriots

World Wide Electricity Super-grid

Reverse 'Incursion' of Coup d'Etat Feb. 2014

Macron Urges EU Dialogue with Russia

Winston Churchill Explains Enigma Russia

Zero Net Energy - January 19, 2022

Dutch Battle Omicron Surge vs Delta

Mandatory vaccination

Netanyahu: AG Mandelblit Seeks Charge of Moral Turpitude

Timeline From Gaddafi to Wagner Coup In Mali

Russian Position Talks with US, NATO and OSCE

Annecy Murder: No Longer A Cold Case

Global Carbon Budget 2021

Political Sectaranism in Northern Ireland today

Alcoholism and drink prices

Almaty - Kazakhstan

Local, National, International Energy (and Other) Events...

Boris Johnson Waves White Flag to Covid-19

Electric Appliances as Virtual Power Plants

Message from the Pretenders

Occasional Series