The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
however on this market (as you say credit rating is indication of default risk) Greece and other developed countries's debt is also rated worse than developing nations debt.
why Greece still has A rating?
But anyway, you're asking the tail to wag the dog. If both the credit rating system and the credit default swap market functioned as advertised, the credit default swap market should be following the credit ratings, not the other way around.
Another point here is that even if both the rating agencies and the CDS markets functioned as advertised, the participants may well have differing political analyses. If the ratings agencies believe that the Greek sovereign debt is covered by an implicit guarantee from Germany, this will be reflected in the ratings. If the price-setting players on the CDS market do not believe this, then their bid and ask prices will reflect their different assumptions about the probability of a bailout.
Of course, this entire discussion is somewhat akin to arguing about the number of angels than can fit on a pinhead, since both the credit rating agencies and the credit default swap markets are obviously broken and being gamed rather blatantly.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
I ask the dog (market) to wag the tail (credit rating) not other way round.
As for Greece - beliefs that some nice aunty will back your cooked books full of debts is irrational to say the least.
If they play fairly than many developing nations's credit ratings should be in the junk category.
Yet, even after IMF bailouts they still enjoy A ratings from rating agencies.
So can be only one solution - dump the rating agencies for all purposes.
And, one more thing - I did not ask to "upgrade the debt" of developing nations as you said before. I asked for fair play and reflection of market conditions, not irrational "beliefs".
Possibly. But it seems to be SOP for the bankers.
Second, the bankers I thought were fighting against transparency in the credit default swap market. They want to keep the deals private. So, how would anyone know what's out there?
Third, Greece had 100% debt to GDP for the last decade. Nothing changed. So, what was cooking in those Greek books, I wonder? Seems to me they've had the same level of debt, and the only change is that the market is now illiquid and risk averse (i.e. no one is lending to Greece).
I want to get to the bottom of this cooked book idea because it hides a lot of things.
In your view credit rating is "the dog" and market is "the tail"?
No, in my view the CDS market is a scam, and the credit rating agencies are in the business of advertisement, not analysis.
But if things worked as advertised, the rating agencies would be the dog and the CDS market would be the tail: The rating agencies should have more information than the market participants (that's the only economic justification for having rating agencies in the first place), so the market should take note of their opinions, not the other way around. If the rating agencies just slavishly follow the CDS market, then you might as well abolish the rating agencies and just use the market spread for credit default swaps instead.
Not when the nice aunty in question is in a currency union with you.
However your defense of their irrational grading policy sounds unconvincing.
Their ratings is pure scam and unlike manipulations on CDS market their questionable rates stand exposed.
CDS issuers have been shown repeatedly to be inadequately capitalised to face an actual default on the underlying, which smells of a scam where CDS premiums are collected with no intention of paying up. The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
everybody can use CDS data right now.
Even if that were true, which as Mig points out below it isn't, capital market prices are completely worthless for estimating things about the real economy.
And rating agencies have the right to publish their assesments.
But they won't, because that would demonstrate to all the world that their ratings are advertising campaigns rather than serious analysis.
I'm not defending it. I'm saying that bad as the ratings agencies undoubtedly are, the capital markets are even worse. So you can't use data from the capital markets to indict the rating agencies.
What you can use to indict the rating agencies is the fact that they've been wrong on any issue of any real importance that they have commented on. That is an indictment that matters.
The failure of their assessments to correlate with the whims of the capital markets is worth only a shrug, since the whims of the capital markets say nothing at all about the real economics of the activity they are supposed to reflect.
You have an irrational belief in market prices. The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
welcome to the fiercely competitive field of uncovincing defenders of their rating scams.
Market prices are known not to be predictors of anything - they tell you how much it costs you to hedge particular exposures as of right now, and in small volumes. They don't tell you what the probability of anything is. In particular, CDS spreads are not probabilities of default.
The probabilities of default quoted as equivalent to various credit ratings are also nonsense, as I have said before on this forum. The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
Then why bother with ratings? Just use CDS spreads.
The answer is partly that both international banking regulation and domestic regulation of things like mutual pension funds have agency credit ratings written into them. The brainless should not be in banking -- Willem Buiter
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Oui - May 13 65 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Oui - May 303 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2712 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 232 comments
by Oui - May 1365 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by gmoke - May 1
by Oui - Apr 30270 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 886 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments